I have read that many financial analysts believe a stock is overvalued if its PEG ratio is greater than 1. Conversely, if a stock's PEG ratio is less than 1, many believe it is undervalued. I don't understand why, in a rational and efficient market, the P/E is supposed to reflect a stock's future earnings growth. For instance, a mature company's stock can have a projected EPS growth rate of 0, but people are still willing to pay something for a future stream of constant earnings.
2006-08-04
03:06:22
·
4 answers
·
asked by
wkndwrer530042
1
in
Investing