English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Philosophy - October 2007

[Selected]: All categories Arts & Humanities Philosophy

2007-10-04 05:12:39 · 28 answers · asked by Rita 6

I am currently visiting this planet. One of my questions is why do so many people seem intent on destroyying others? Why are there things you call wars? Can the Earth not continue without war? Peace to you all

2007-10-04 05:05:42 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is it possible to be born and live within the sovereign and not be part of social contract?

2007-10-04 04:34:23 · 4 answers · asked by ycats 4

2007-10-04 04:32:26 · 15 answers · asked by Ms Informed 6

2007-10-04 04:12:58 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

When Rand herself is taken to her logical extremes, she is not proven wrong, but only proven to be someone that particular people to do not like. She has been described as "cold," and as "black-and-white," but not proven epistemologically wrong. When she proves other thinkers to be epistemologically incorrect by drawing their ideas out to the extreme that it leads to, she is villified. Her own extremes led to the book "Atlas Shrugged." Every reader of this book sees her point and does not disagree that it is the extreme. They only say, "Oh it will never get that bad," yet year after year we grow ever closer to the extremes she proved would become our destruction. I believe she upsets people because they do not want to see her extreme become reality, yet refuse to accept that it is already happening. My own literature teachers told me I would "grow out of" Rand's ideas. Arrogance knows no bounds.

2007-10-04 03:58:08 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-04 03:20:40 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

This is a philosophical question my friends. Please have a philosophical answer. Again, my deep appreciation to your answers. Have a good day! Tjank you very much.

2007-10-04 02:47:36 · 5 answers · asked by Third P 6

Is it something that 2 ppl imagine exists between them, or is it something that truly exists above and beyond them?

2007-10-04 02:07:51 · 14 answers · asked by dazedandconf 2

This is a philosophical question and calls for a philosophical answer please. Thank you for time giving your answers. Have a great day!

2007-10-04 02:04:58 · 9 answers · asked by Third P 6

2007-10-04 02:01:23 · 45 answers · asked by Ady 2

some people let go their special someone and is willing to wait for them to come it they really are meant to be, but is it advisable to do so? what will be the essence of waiting?

2007-10-04 01:56:14 · 12 answers · asked by judz 1

The question basically is, would you still buy a Ferrari or an equally expensive car, if nobody ever saw you driving in it? If you lived in an area where the population was extremely small, and basically you never saw people throughout the day, would you still buy and ultra-luxury item, if no one ever saw you in it? Is buying a 200K dollar car about you wanting to drive it, or wanting to be SEEN driving it?

2007-10-04 01:30:20 · 8 answers · asked by mike9626 3

2007-10-04 00:53:38 · 10 answers · asked by jay.johns 2

2007-10-04 00:17:55 · 19 answers · asked by hippy1975chick 5

2007-10-04 00:06:58 · 9 answers · asked by reubenindustries 3

Why is bringing the Taliban into the Afghanistan government "respecting the right of a sovereign country to self-determination" ?


typical media grab:
"Hamid Karzai, the president of Afghanistan, wants to bring the Taliban into the government, so (Des) Browne's position is not totally unreasonable. It's respecting the right of a sovereign country to self-determination"

typical media grab:
"It makes sense to give the Taliban an official platform for expression".

2007-10-03 23:43:38 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

What are your suggestions to improve the quality the work posted at http://predictor.awardspace.com

2007-10-03 23:38:44 · 2 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1

2007-10-03 23:33:19 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

1.No whole is without a part.
2.No part is without a whole.
3.No difference is without an equivalence.
4.No equivalence is without a difference.
5.No link is without a limit.
6.No limit is without a link.
7.No influence is without a sensation.
8.No sensation is without an influence.
9. No derivative is without an origin.
10.No origin is without a derivative.
11.No condition is without a rule.
12.No rule is without a condition.
13.No fulfillment is without an intent.
14.No intent is without a fulfillment.

2007-10-03 22:55:45 · 4 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1

if not what's after "space" or "the universe". it's very frutrating and makes me wana go CRAZY when I think about it.

2007-10-03 22:04:24 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

is it just us over reacting and maybe seeing things that arn't really there, are minds are extremely powerfull and can make nothing into somthing. are they really there?

2007-10-03 21:55:06 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-03 21:24:19 · 12 answers · asked by quidomango 2

The basic question I am posing here is as to what makes us choose to take any responsibility for a period well beyond our own lifetime.

2007-10-03 21:19:40 · 19 answers · asked by small 7

2007-10-03 20:34:46 · 8 answers · asked by murmur 1

In this time of crisis, where every single teen is more focused in simple things that doesn't require a lot of thinking, and where we all take the easy path, i can't hesitate to wonder, what about the lost competitiveness? how do we improve it? how do we make of ourselves a competitive person in this world? what do we need to be better and to be able to compete with the others and win? is there any suggestion? thanks a lot! have a nice day!

2007-10-03 20:32:02 · 3 answers · asked by dabino 4

fedest.com, questions and answers