English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1.No whole is without a part.
2.No part is without a whole.
3.No difference is without an equivalence.
4.No equivalence is without a difference.
5.No link is without a limit.
6.No limit is without a link.
7.No influence is without a sensation.
8.No sensation is without an influence.
9. No derivative is without an origin.
10.No origin is without a derivative.
11.No condition is without a rule.
12.No rule is without a condition.
13.No fulfillment is without an intent.
14.No intent is without a fulfillment.

2007-10-03 22:55:45 · 4 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

4 answers

Nothing is false here... all are truism derived from the very definition.

2007-10-05 23:50:40 · answer #1 · answered by small 7 · 0 0

Samlyn Josfyn
1 Which one among the following is false?
1.No whole is without a part. Possibly definitively false
2.No part is without a whole. possibly contingently false
3.No difference is without an equivalence. false
4.No equivalence is without a difference. true
5.No link is without a limit. possibly false
6.No limit is without a link. unknown
7.No influence is without a sensation. false
8.No sensation is without an influence. sensation is influence
9. No derivative is without an origin. genesis
10.No origin is without a derivative. origin is derivation
11.No condition is without a rule. determinant
12.No rule is without a condition. redundant
13.No fulfillment is without an intent. false
14.No intent is without a fulfillment. requirement

2007-10-04 16:17:54 · answer #2 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 0 0

4. no equivalence is without a difference
-it can be a sum..

2007-10-03 23:15:58 · answer #3 · answered by Flux 2 · 0 0

i think these are a bunch of ironic statements created to think, confuse and irritate. i have seen these revolving in Y!A already...

2007-10-03 23:00:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers