Philosophy - August 2007

2007-08-04 01:27:14 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

If we choose to not use our genitalia for its natural purpose - i.e. procreation - what does this mean?

Can we accept it as being the norm for not choosing to use what was given to us to use by nature? For example, homosexuality. However, if one suffers from infertility and thus cannot procreate, what does this mean? If one argues that homosexuals are useless by nature since they choose to have gay sex, it can be argued that a person who suffers from infertility, too, are useless. Or anyone in general who chooses not to have children.

Is our purpose in life to procreate, hence our genetilia ?

2007-08-04 01:17:29 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-04 01:05:17 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-04 01:05:06 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-04 01:00:05 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Enasics is posted at http://wwf.totalh.com

I like to know - Whether it is meaningful or nonsense?

2007-08-04 00:51:57 · 3 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1

2007-08-04 00:50:14 · 6 answers · asked by Third P 6

2007-08-03 23:51:57 · 5 answers · asked by Steve 1

That doesnt mean mixing colors together, i mean a new color, that you cant get by mixing other colors.

2007-08-03 23:12:05 · 14 answers · asked by tepro25 2

(or maybe we could convince them that "We" are the ones who get 26 Virgins when we go to heaven after being killed by them...?!?)

(although...to tell ya' the truth...I'd prefer that my "Heavenly Harem Hotties" be a little more experienced...)

2007-08-03 23:05:04 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

...and collect them in the empty lot next to our house...Do you think I'll go to Hell for that...?

2007-08-03 22:11:17 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

If we are not the most intelligent life form in the universe, why hasn’t any other life form developed super advanced travel systems and influenced our lives? Surely if we are so primitive, they would have found us interesting just as we find ants, cockroaches and snails interesting, so interesting that we keep some of these lower intelligent animals as pets or samples for testing and experimenting.

Surely we would be conscious of such activity, just like our pets or lab animals if we were captured, tested upon or kept as pets, if we were in the same position as these other life forms which we have?

2007-08-03 22:08:24 · 8 answers · asked by http://hogshead.pokerknave.com/ 6

Or even pay attention?

Thank you for your answer! :) Have a wonderful weekend! :)

2007-08-03 22:04:51 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

One has already created intelligence, while the other is still trying to create intelligence. Who sees the metaphor in this?

2007-08-03 22:00:54 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Since we have the mind we understand the time ,since we have the body we understand the space and since we have body and mind we are effected by causation.God is beyond all these factors .So we are unable to see the which is beyond time space and causation.want an answer without logic.Want a straight forward answer for a simple mind

2007-08-03 21:59:52 · 18 answers · asked by lathika r 2

2007-08-03 21:48:51 · 18 answers · asked by Silent 4

erotic, when the chef bones the chicken; or is it just me?

2007-08-03 21:39:39 · 6 answers · asked by Princess Picalilly 4

2007-08-03 21:39:09 · 9 answers · asked by small 7

2007-08-03 21:35:34 · 31 answers · asked by Der23 1

Nothingness would never be as: part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, link, limit, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condtion, intent, or fullfillment.

What is your opinion on this statement?

2007-08-03 19:43:23 · 9 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1

I mean, take a good long look at your feet.

It's like, WHOAH.

FEET ARE CRAZY.

2007-08-03 19:29:03 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Here's an example:

Suppose that you have an MP3 playlist alphabetically ordered, but you prefer to listen to it in a random order. You turn on the shuffle but the songs still play in a perfectly alphabetical order.

Unlikely? Yes, but definitely possible. Would that indicate that order is just a subset of chaos?

2007-08-03 19:18:53 · 9 answers · asked by Belzetot 5

2007-08-03 19:17:28 · 7 answers · asked by ? 5

What does your choice say about you?

2007-08-03 18:32:32 · 12 answers · asked by bonacker 4

2007-08-03 18:21:01 · 7 answers · asked by lethal athlete 1

I was watching "What the bleep went down the rabbit hole?" and it tells you of how your thoughts create reality everyday.

Well if everything alive is creating reality according to reality,

What about when nothing was alive?
During the Big Bang or any beginning of the Universe?

Even if everything evolved from microscoptic bacteria, bacteria has a nucleus, which is similar to a brain.

So before these bacteria or Adam and Eve were alive. What was creating reality?

This is similar to intelligent design, trying to prove God exists through science.

2007-08-03 17:50:25 · 6 answers · asked by Michael C 1

can Lies help truth to prevail over lies?

:)

2007-08-03 17:48:05 · 29 answers · asked by *Hope* 3

Come on, this is a genuine question.... why celebrate mediocrity? answer the question that this link takes you to. could care less about this one.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=An.i0o83koyelGUVO4vg_fr27BR.?qid=20070803210404AA3W1S8

2007-08-03 17:16:39 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

and we became too selfish, regarding to other people?

2007-08-03 17:12:39 · 13 answers · asked by steven25t 7

2007-08-03 16:31:56 · 25 answers · asked by honey 5