Philosophy - July 2007

i told my g/f u could find the answer to any question on here so she told me to ask this.

2007-07-08 06:00:22 · 14 answers · asked by Darth Nihilus 2

2007-07-08 05:45:17 · 9 answers · asked by Gypsy Gal 6

(or is it possible to have both?)

2007-07-08 05:07:17 · 10 answers · asked by megalomaniac 7

????

2007-07-08 05:05:57 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Once upon a time I did an Acces course ... Preparation for doing TCM (Traditional Chinese Medicine) at Middlesex university it was meant to be.
I went to the university open day and was told by the professor that he would be happy with me, as a mature student, if I understood biology to A-level standard. I told him I wanted to further my study on a philosophical/theoretical level after i finished the degree course and he was fine with that. Chinese medicine has a recorded history of at least 2500 years.
Originally the college had put me in the Acces to Humanities and Social Sciences. After I told them what had been told to me at the open day they decided I should be in Access to Science.
It was way too much science for what i needed and asked if i could do some units from both Access courses. Since that was perfectly acceptable for the degree i wanted to do i could not see the problem.

2007-07-08 03:16:08 · 10 answers · asked by Part Time Cynic 7

2007-07-08 02:58:32 · 32 answers · asked by reiner L 1

the question is the answer

an o.g once told me life is what you make it homie

2007-07-08 02:47:44 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-08 02:41:54 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

and it is an absolute coincidence that the arbitrary arrangement of letters make any sense to you...

2007-07-08 01:36:48 · 13 answers · asked by ★Greed★ 7

WITHOUT THE UNIVERSALS WITH WHICH THE THOUGHTS ABOUT YOURSELF ARE MADE, NO THOUGHT ABOUT ANYTHING OTHER THAN YOURSELF WOULD BE MADE.

Is this statement philosophically correct?

2007-07-07 22:51:00 · 16 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1

NO THOUGHT ABOUT ANYTHING OTHER THAN YOURSELF WOULD BE MADE WITHOUT THE UNIVERSALS WITH WHICH THE THOUGHTS ABOUT YOURSELF WERE MADE.

Could you rephrase this statement into a more simpler one?

2007-07-07 22:20:47 · 18 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1

No thought about anything other than you would be made without the universals that make the thoughts about you.

What is your opinion on this statement?

2007-07-07 21:10:55 · 4 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1

2007-07-07 20:18:17 · 4 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1

2007-07-07 20:03:44 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-07 19:16:07 · 11 answers · asked by Herman 1

of life? does anyone know?

2007-07-07 18:50:03 · 10 answers · asked by billy phamous 2

2007-07-07 18:46:50 · 5 answers · asked by geyamala 7

Men thought they could make an unsinkable ship just like they thought they could build a a tower that could reach heaven, and God was angry, gave them different languages so they couldnt continue with the project...

2007-07-07 18:44:46 · 10 answers · asked by simonetta j 2

That they're predestined to prosper and be happy in this world?

2007-07-07 18:08:58 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-07 18:07:20 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

:-(

2007-07-07 17:53:10 · 21 answers · asked by enki 4

This will probaly only make sense to active metaphysical people. So if you dont understand dont worry. But here it is. I can get connected to my metaphysical self and stay connected. then out of knowwhere i cant. and it will last for days at a time. it feels as though my door is shut and i cant open it. btu ten it opens an it is okay for ahwile then it starts again. Its driving me nutty. And giving me a massive case of depression. that i didnt have before hand. its liek haveing your sould closed to you after finnally being at peace. i just need to know if anybody else has experienced this. or am i just alone in the dark here?

2007-07-07 17:26:38 · 7 answers · asked by Another Lost Memory 1

God either wants to eliminate bad things and cannot, or can but does not want to, or neither wishes to nor can, or both wants to and can.
If he wants to and cannot, he is weak -- and this does not apply to God.
If he can but does not want to, then he is spiteful -- which is equally foreign to God's nature.
If he neither wants to nor can, he is both weak and spiteful and so not a god.
If he wants to and can, which is the only thing fitting for a god, where then do bad things come from? Or why does he not eliminate them?[

2007-07-07 17:18:27 · 19 answers · asked by Nikki 1

once we are inlove, cant we really control it?

Thanxxx a lotsssssssss

2007-07-07 16:52:03 · 14 answers · asked by aLVaRo 2

2007-07-07 16:46:29 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Remember in the bible when Adam & Eve ate the fruit from the tree of all knowledge of Good and Bad and they found out that they were naked, what do you think will happen if we took another bite from that fruit? What could we find out next?

2007-07-07 16:32:21 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous

I believe there is, it just has not been discovered or invented yet.

2007-07-07 16:28:42 · 27 answers · asked by lifescircle 5

Do you think that one day every guitar riff, lyric, poem, novel idea, movie script, painting idea, EVERY IDEA will be already used?

2007-07-07 16:19:54 · 9 answers · asked by Junior 1

or sometimes the choices are but another set of problems disguised as solutions?

2007-07-07 16:16:58 · 35 answers · asked by enki 4

1. for all things (x), (x) has at least one characteristic.
2. in order for all things (x) to has at least one characteristic, (x) must exist.
3. at least one characteristic all things (x) can have is the characteristic of non-existentence.
4. Therefore, it is impossible for all things (x) not to exist.

ps I hope you see the paradox, yet you also see how the truth of my premises support the truth of my conclusion.

2007-07-07 15:53:41 · 8 answers · asked by Daniel P 6