Philosophy - December 2006

it is just a song by sufjan stevens i just love these days. but i won´t ask you about death...:)just about: why do we have this particular and personal view of the world and not another one. why do i see things my way and not your way? when and why did this happen?
please do not follow the nature-nurture debate line...

2006-12-19 20:28:12 · 12 answers · asked by vax 2

2006-12-19 20:01:26 · 9 answers · asked by ronny c 1

Don't search luv, let luv find u. It's called falling in luv, coz u don't force urself to fall, u just fall and there will be someone to catch U...........will we search love.....or ,,,wait wait
...and what happen we can t find

2006-12-19 19:56:18 · 12 answers · asked by ronny c 1

if u had option ...love or money
what will u chose...why....

2006-12-19 19:38:31 · 19 answers · asked by ronny c 1

I've seen thousads of movie.An I realized that the sound effects and the soundtrack has a big role in making beautiful movie.I often touched or inspired by it.I keep wondering why our lifes don't have one...
Imagining, while I'm in a snowy day there's a christmas song in my ears.
don't you want it?

2006-12-19 19:34:48 · 11 answers · asked by anchovy_ICS 2

I myself am an existentialist. I believe we create our own meaning, and there isn't a single concrete answer.

2006-12-19 19:00:50 · 16 answers · asked by bornlie 3

2006-12-19 18:43:17 · 9 answers · asked by shaun 1

its said that god wishes that all of us reaches his empire atlast,so the church teaches.if he is god,and gid wishes so,is man powerful to destroy his desires and make god desp?that is,can man go against his deires and reach hell.

2006-12-19 18:19:41 · 11 answers · asked by Ajith E 1

2006-12-19 16:44:44 · 11 answers · asked by RWIZ 3

This may sound strange, but humans do make life harder on themselves. There is always this continuous cycle where one generation works to benefit the next. The enjoyment we get is everything that comes in the process. But if we were to ease it up on ourselves, we would all have better lives. The standard of living would be exponentially better. Whats the rush to increase knowledge about technology? Every human being should be able to enjoy life, and if that means slower technological and social transformations, doesnt the former outweight the latter?

2006-12-19 16:43:09 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

What is the meaning of life to you?

2006-12-19 16:41:57 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-19 16:28:59 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

I really love mathematics, but I believe it is much too pratical especially calculus, and you move further and further away from answering and adressing the true concerns of mankind and the world.

Philosophy and Politics is also very interesting but they, especially philosophy strays too much from the prcatical purposes of this technological and material world. You can't really achieve a profession in this, except very few like professors.

What is the intermediate possibility between these, philosophy and mathematics, profession that will give me a earning but not too preatical to render me useless and without voice upon the other matters of men, the non-material ones.

2006-12-19 16:11:44 · 11 answers · asked by Zidane 3

would you deliver?

2006-12-19 15:45:26 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-19 15:41:55 · 14 answers · asked by ulu2011 2

2006-12-19 15:35:02 · 21 answers · asked by simplyJESSE 2

Ever feel like when you are silent in a room with your best friend. You are speaking better then you would if your mouths were actually open. And even still.... you both believe it. Maybe this is just apart of the mystery of life....
Just a thought

2006-12-19 15:34:08 · 12 answers · asked by meowzippity 1

2006-12-19 15:29:54 · 11 answers · asked by warr31 4

the one written by maulana a k azad. is it true that this book was not allowed to be published for thirty years?

2006-12-19 14:58:21 · 1 answers · asked by Rubaet M 1

2006-12-19 14:58:20 · 10 answers · asked by tirebiter 6

2006-12-19 14:57:51 · 14 answers · asked by K. D. M. 6

...some sort of blasphemy and apparently think the existence of the Critique of Pure Reason absolves them from the need to justify their preferences in matters of the legitimacy of objects of knowledge?
What has Kant really proven? What is his real contribution? Couln't you be an empiricist even if you had never read Kant? How many actual scientists bothered with Kant's ideas on the legitimacy of science?

Question with a slightly Nietzschean slant...

2006-12-19 14:43:42 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Where are there practical applications of philosophy aside from politicians.

Maybe lawyers or judges?

Or even editorialists?

2006-12-19 14:36:58 · 8 answers · asked by Smokey 2

Stop creating in broader sense of the term.

2006-12-19 14:29:56 · 25 answers · asked by akshay s 3

Music is something that is appealing to almost everyone, but does anyone know why? Wouldn't God's absence mean that sound would have to evolve? What makes a 7th chord suspenseful, a major chord happy, the tonic a resolution? Even if music could exist without God, why would it?

2006-12-19 14:27:36 · 21 answers · asked by James 2

2006-12-19 14:12:47 · 41 answers · asked by nastasham 1

All we really have to do is live and die.

2006-12-19 14:12:26 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-19 14:03:41 · 18 answers · asked by nastasham 1

2006-12-19 14:03:40 · 13 answers · asked by Diesel Weasel 7

2006-12-19 14:00:55 · 29 answers · asked by Ms.B 1