Philosophy - October 2006

2006-10-03 05:48:22 · 10 answers · asked by Bill W 1

hmmmmm *brain cracks*

2006-10-03 05:44:21 · 16 answers · asked by laser_vamp 2

brief summary

2006-10-03 05:43:13 · 3 answers · asked by kramaster 5

is it posible to change someone´s way of living/life?
and if you would say: this way of living is better for you.. would this be like a dictator or not?

2006-10-03 05:42:24 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-03 05:35:18 · 18 answers · asked by adorable 4

2006-10-03 05:34:38 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-03 05:12:12 · 5 answers · asked by GRATY GITTU BOY 1

2006-10-03 04:53:40 · 8 answers · asked by S 4

2006-10-03 04:42:49 · 16 answers · asked by GRATY GITTU BOY 1

2006-10-03 04:37:13 · 9 answers · asked by doto7640 1

2006-10-03 04:36:09 · 7 answers · asked by CaptainObvious 3

2006-10-03 04:35:32 · 15 answers · asked by needlepinch 1

2006-10-03 04:16:15 · 6 answers · asked by pobike05 1

2006-10-03 04:16:12 · 12 answers · asked by S 4

2006-10-03 04:13:38 · 4 answers · asked by ? 4

What do you think?

2006-10-03 04:06:56 · 7 answers · asked by Analyst 7

2006-10-03 04:03:51 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-03 04:03:26 · 22 answers · asked by Silkie1 4

2006-10-03 03:33:11 · 30 answers · asked by SupahFly 1

Before the marriage i want to tell my husband about my ex boy friends relationship but he said he was not intrested. i am from a open culture he is from a closed culture from india. Now after our marriage he is not happy to see my boy friends photoes and gifts. He dont want to listen about my past history. He says it is not important for him. It is important for him the present and the future. We love each other. what can i do to over come my hushands anger?

2006-10-03 03:18:24 · 24 answers · asked by theena b 1

why do people think it's their right to meddle in my life and 'set it right', even if i'm perfectly happy the way i am? why do they assume they know better?

2006-10-03 01:55:39 · 11 answers · asked by S 4

All our acts turn upon what we assume to be true, what we assume to know. The connection is so strong, so thoughtless, that when those things we need to be true are threatened, we try to make them true with our acts. We condemn the innocent to make them guilty. We raise the wicked to make it holy. Like the mother who continuesnursing her dead babe we act out of refusal.
When we believe without ground or cause , conviction is all we possess, and acts of conviction become our only demonstration. Our beliefs become our gods and we make sacrifices to appease them.
Do you think this may be true in fundamentalism of emotion and faith?

2006-10-03 01:48:55 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-03 01:32:05 · 22 answers · asked by ? 2

2006-10-03 01:31:00 · 11 answers · asked by ? 2

2006-10-03 01:18:45 · 32 answers · asked by S 4

What are said to be perishable are these bodies of the Self, which is indestructible, inscrutable, eternal. Therefore, fight O Arjuna.

Thus, Arjuna, only these bodies are by nature destructible, therefore fight.

He who thinks this (Self) to be the killer and he mho thinks this killed, both of them do not know; this Self neither kills nor it is killed

You identify yourself with your body and others with their bodies and think that you will kill and the Kauravas will be killed, without knowing the truth. If you think properly, you will realise that you are not the killer and they are not the ones to be killed.

He is never born nor does he die; nor having been, he will ever cease to be. Unborn, eternal, ever-lasting and ancient, he is not killed when the body is killed.

Source :- http://www.saibaba.us/texts/jnaneshwari/chpt02.html

Is this a controversial aspect of Bhagavad Gita ?

2006-10-03 01:15:40 · 5 answers · asked by jayakrishnaathmavidya 4

I do not expect correct answer from any of you, what I'm trying to do is to start a fruitful discussion which may yield some common points to agree upon. Please answer only if you have seriously pondered over the question and feel the necessity to know the answer.

2006-10-03 01:09:07 · 33 answers · asked by Curious_Buddy 1

2006-10-03 01:08:46 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

i've tried but the past keeps intruding into my present....

2006-10-03 01:05:20 · 21 answers · asked by S 4

If the criteria of self to distinguish things vary, then:

If I ask you to distinguish a cow, you will distinguish a donkey as cow.

If I ask you to distinguish a tree, you will say water as a tree!

Human communications become meaningless if the criteria of self to distinguish things vary.

2006-10-03 00:53:34 · 5 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1