I've already asked similar q's under astronomy and space, but please bear w' me.
The 'brane' theory of multiple universes (if I understand it correctly) was developed to account for certain phenomena (ourselves) which according to probability, would take not only longer time to appear than the universe has existed, but longer than the universe is calculated to remain.
So the hypothesis is that there is a much larger universe than we have been aware of, and ours is only a tiny portion among many more which exist beside our own. In other words, if the universe it too small and ephemeral for us to have appeared by the working of random chance, assume a larger and longer lasting universe such that the probablility is assured.
This seems awfully like a question-begging argument, to me. It might satisfy the mathematics, but not our mannishness, the innate personal character of our beings.
Here is the analogy: An elderly lady once attended a lecture on cosmology.
2006-10-24
15:04:34
·
7 answers
·
asked by
cdf-rom
7
in
Philosophy