why don't we use the same logic about global warming?
If you are unfamiliar with "the bet" - it's simply believing in God because you want to avoid the consequences of not believing in God. Please, do not argue about religion.
I'd really like to know: Why don't we do something about global warming just on the basis that if it does exist, then we will be solving a global problem and even if it doesn't, we'd be creating a world that is better for our children to live in. Either way humanity is better off.
However, if we choose not to believe in global warming we open up the possibility for some rather disasterous consequences.
2006-09-20
20:42:08
·
10 answers
·
asked by
raven7night
4
in
Philosophy