Some will try to argue that the "glorious struggle" of the Civil War was fought NOT for slavery, but for states' rights. However, the specific right that the Southern states were fighting for was, in fact, the right to own slaves. The South only seceded when confronted with the pro-abolitionist President Lincoln. The wealthy aristocracy that made up the bulk of the Confederate government and of the officers in the Confederate army had a vested interested in maintaining slavery as it was slave labor that had made them wealthy in the first place. While it is true that the vast majority of the enlisted men in the Confederate Army didn't own slaves, and even true that most white Southerners were too poor to own slaves, this cannot mitigate the profit motive of those in command. Even if it is true that most white Southerners enlisted out of a desire to protect their families, property, and communities from Northern invaders, how can anyone reasonably ignore the CSA's legacy of slavery?
2006-07-17
04:25:51
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
History