Arts & Humanities - 13 July 2006

My friend that started ballet by the age of 2 and said that I couldn't start by my age. My other friend said I could. I'm confused!

2006-07-13 23:42:03 · 24 answers · asked by wodymagro 2 in Dancing

2006-07-13 23:41:17 · 2 answers · asked by Arjun d 2 in Books & Authors

give me some information about islam the basicas

2006-07-13 23:39:32 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Arts & Humanities

?

2006-07-13 23:33:57 · 13 answers · asked by forevagrow101 1 in Other - Visual Arts

2006-07-13 23:31:17 · 4 answers · asked by Alex E 1 in Books & Authors

2006-07-13 23:30:50 · 3 answers · asked by donfranug 1 in History

2006-07-13 23:13:48 · 15 answers · asked by hellsangel 2 in Philosophy

2006-07-13 23:12:01 · 7 answers · asked by hellsangel 2 in Philosophy

2006-07-13 23:11:14 · 18 answers · asked by frank s 2 in History

This is quite a serious question you know!!

2006-07-13 23:07:07 · 19 answers · asked by rak_shas_moni 1 in Philosophy

This is in accordance to my question about is it wrong to kill pediphiles drug dealers and rapist etc... ones that wont be prosecuted for their crimes...
Is it also wrong to kill them to rid society of creatures such as these? Ones that prey on people from dark corners... hiding for a time to strike...

2006-07-13 23:03:55 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Philosophy

2006-07-13 22:51:18 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Philosophy

I GOT A CARRRRRRRRRR LOL

2006-07-13 22:50:52 · 13 answers · asked by Lita M 2 in Other - Arts & Humanities

not just wronge but crazy

2006-07-13 22:36:19 · 5 answers · asked by clever+dimwhitted 1 in Philosophy

2006-07-13 22:34:56 · 5 answers · asked by sandras77 4 in Philosophy

2006-07-13 22:34:53 · 12 answers · asked by pranoy sv 1 in Other - Arts & Humanities

2006-07-13 22:34:42 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in History

....For everyone's information, I am straight......

2006-07-13 22:33:53 · 2 answers · asked by Rabindra 3 in Philosophy

2006-07-13 22:33:12 · 10 answers · asked by kevyn_uk 2 in History

2006-07-13 22:31:56 · 11 answers · asked by KLM66 1 in History

How about this for a stupid religious question:

"Do fish believe in their own God? If so: is it just as likely
that they are wanting to go to war with us humans for us believing in what they think is a false god?",

We start wars for the whole false idols thing in one form or another (most religions have this caveate, mostly as a protection clause I think),

As we have developed intelligence, it follows that other member of the animal kingdom will eventually:

So What will happen when other animals evolve sentience? They will develop a belief system to fill in the gaps of what they don't understand (just as humans did in our pre-history and where our following of early natueral gods (ie. sun gods, rain gods, etc.,))....

So, theoretically: could the theatre of religous war start between species?


..

2006-07-13 22:25:45 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Philosophy

2006-07-13 22:21:10 · 22 answers · asked by kylejeffry19 2 in Books & Authors

2006-07-13 22:19:26 · 11 answers · asked by hellsangel 2 in Philosophy

2006-07-13 22:16:54 · 29 answers · asked by Liberator Sieg 2 in Books & Authors

2006-07-13 22:12:05 · 21 answers · asked by kylejeffry19 2 in Philosophy

when a mirror is broken by accident by the person does it affect the person life and or is it all jsut a myth.. and if so what can be done to clear it up of the bad luck that it brings to them...

2006-07-13 22:01:37 · 8 answers · asked by sweetcarmel37 1 in Other - Visual Arts

Hitler the most violent autocrat ever.Wheras gandhi a total contrast following ahimsa(non violence.Both were present around the same time as well.Now im asking in terms of character and capability.Dont tell me Hitler killed a lot of ppl how can he be a candidate.Beign hitler as well is now joke.

Personally i think it's gandhi....coz it's so easy to follow violence wheras gandhi the only man who believed in non violence at a time when not nly india but the world was in a mess.And for the record there was supposed to be an official poll on this topic but it was cancelled later.

2006-07-13 22:00:22 · 16 answers · asked by Rida 3 in History

which is totally autonomous and independent of any network and therefore inexpensive for its use. It uses a sample of DNA (hair, blood, nail, a piece of skin) of the person you want to communicate. I have successfuly tested with my kids and it works perfect. Therefore this idea could bring me “many” millions. “It can bring bacon home” in big pieces. BUT, I am skeptical because someone with a big DNA database(government, secret services, terrorists) should be able to abuse it and gain control over people's lives without their consent. Unfortunately I can’t think anything as an antidote if this kind of misuse. So, the question remains. Shall I get the millions or get the secret in my grave with me when my time is due? I have destroyed already the device. My kids have no idea how or what did I do and they were getting the messages.

2006-07-13 21:58:35 · 11 answers · asked by UncleGeorge 4 in Philosophy

2006-07-13 21:55:30 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Philosophy

2006-07-13 21:52:46 · 8 answers · asked by The Lioness 2 in Philosophy