English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

which is totally autonomous and independent of any network and therefore inexpensive for its use. It uses a sample of DNA (hair, blood, nail, a piece of skin) of the person you want to communicate. I have successfuly tested with my kids and it works perfect. Therefore this idea could bring me “many” millions. “It can bring bacon home” in big pieces. BUT, I am skeptical because someone with a big DNA database(government, secret services, terrorists) should be able to abuse it and gain control over people's lives without their consent. Unfortunately I can’t think anything as an antidote if this kind of misuse. So, the question remains. Shall I get the millions or get the secret in my grave with me when my time is due? I have destroyed already the device. My kids have no idea how or what did I do and they were getting the messages.

2006-07-13 21:58:35 · 11 answers · asked by UncleGeorge 4 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

11 answers

I think that somewhere inside you, you know the answer, just follow your instinct im sure it'll be the right thing

2006-07-13 22:07:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Calculator became invented lengthy decrease back. (Odhoner invented the first commercially produced mechanical calculator in 1873) besides the undeniable fact that it grew to develop into time-honored in 1980 or so. Now each human being has forgotten to do calculation manually. each human being makes use of a calculator even for multiplying 5 with 10. After the computer grew to develop into time-honored slowly we are getting a torpid showpiece at homestead. it is going to take about 50 extra years to remodel all individuals into coach piece - except watching television we would not do something. Now if scientists can strengthen a pc you're imagining we can loose the experience even of playing television courses. we can have interaction pcs to do the crying and giggling for us. All our homes will resemble Madam Tussuad's wax museum and the international will be managed by Robots in basic terms.

2016-11-06 08:55:14 · answer #2 · answered by jannelle 4 · 0 0

If it somehow allows you to eavesdrop upon others then I suggest taking it to your grave, but if it only allows transmission to the subject, then the transmission method can be analyzed and you can create a 'white noise' generator that sends static using the same method to interrupt unwanted transmissions.

As far as making money off the item, DNA can be altered with viruses to prevent exact DNA databasing, so go for it, and if you can make it handheld, it could be something that destroys currently existing communication monopolies, and I wouldn't cry over that loss.

2006-07-13 22:09:30 · answer #3 · answered by Demosthenes&Locke 3 · 0 0

If Einstein was still alive He would smack you behind the head and remind you Goverment used his famous formula for Nuke bombs! So if your own little ass is more important than human slavery, have a ball with Uncle Sam ,Uncle George.

2006-07-13 22:15:09 · answer #4 · answered by Sherluck 6 · 0 0

Money comes and goes and you can't take it to the grave. A clear concience is yours to keep forever and can last eternally.

2006-07-13 22:21:52 · answer #5 · answered by # one 6 · 0 0

Take it to the grave with you. The world is corrupt enough as it is.

2006-07-13 22:04:14 · answer #6 · answered by luscious0071 4 · 0 0

double you tee eff is this???revolutionary communication device?HA!ure not even smart enuf to lie...i bet the mental age of ur kids is higher than urs...way higher

2006-07-14 01:01:56 · answer #7 · answered by boxofmoosh 1 · 0 0

take the money and make your kids the happiest kids on earth, if you arent yanking my chain that is. and the secret is ALREADY out!

2006-07-13 22:03:16 · answer #8 · answered by Dorkchop 2 · 0 0

My recommendation is to take care of your compulsive lying habit. THEN make your decision.

2006-07-13 22:02:59 · answer #9 · answered by Rewsna 4 · 0 0

i don't think millions and clear consciousness are at loggerheads and one should be at the cost of the other

2006-07-13 22:03:15 · answer #10 · answered by raj 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers