2006-07-13 22:21:10 · 22 answers · asked by kylejeffry19 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
Talk about a battle of the lightweights.
2006-07-13 22:38:00 · answer #1 · answered by iansand 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jk Rowling
2006-07-13 22:24:28 · answer #2 · answered by summer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's like comparing apples and oranges. JK Rowling is creating an entirely fictional universe, and Dan Brown is working at least partly in the real world, even though the premise of the book is fictional. I would give JK Rowling the edge, just because of her creativity--even the controversial parts of The Da Vinci Code were borrowed from earlier books.
2006-07-17 03:41:27 · answer #3 · answered by cross-stitch kelly 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
JK Rowling sucks. Dan Brown is better.
2006-07-14 03:35:15 · answer #4 · answered by Smiles Like She Means It 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
JK Rowling
2006-07-14 00:07:40 · answer #5 · answered by jeziika 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
JK Rowling
2006-07-13 22:29:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
JK Rowling.
2006-07-14 03:17:42 · answer #7 · answered by moonshadowangel 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, they are very different... different styles, different kind of stories.
I guess I prefer JK Rowling, but that may have to do with the fact that I read the original Harry Potter's but only read the translated version of Dan Brown's books.
2006-07-14 01:22:55 · answer #8 · answered by landslide 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd have to say Rowling is the better author, but that certainly does not mean Brown is a bad one, just not as good.
2006-07-14 03:11:23 · answer #9 · answered by BlueManticore 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dan Brown
2006-07-13 23:50:09 · answer #10 · answered by Mohammed S. Sharif 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've never read anything by Dan Brown, so I feel highly qualified to say that JK is clearly the better author.
2006-07-14 05:01:07 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋