If you've seen me post, you would know I'm always citing third party sources like Whitehouse.org, the Census, Library of Congress, American Meteorological Society, Geological Society of America, etc, etc.
Why is it cons rarely do the same thing? At most, they will cite right-wing partisan sites like CATO, newsmax, and Heritage.
You don't see me citing democratic underground or moveon.org.
Don't cons want to learn something new or VERIFY what you believe really is true?
For example, some con said there was double digit unemployment under Carter. Had he verified this for himself (on the Labor department website) he would have seen there was no double digit unemployment under Carter and that in fact unemployment was higher under Nixon and Reagan.
http://www.bls.gov/cps/prev_yrs.htm
2007-07-16
04:08:15
·
15 answers
·
asked by
trovalta_stinks_2
3
in
Politics