In a previous question I argued that it was impossible to prove that God exists scientifically, therefore Creationism is not science. They came back at me by saying that scientists are interpreting natural causes from the data and Creationists are interpreting Supernatural beings from the data and that creationists have the right to teach their interpretations in public schools. Here is my beef with that statement. There is absolutely nothing that can't possibly be explained by “God did it.” If I throw a baseball through the air, you could interpret that the ball is flying through the air because I put force on the ball. However, you could also interpret this by saying that it did not go flying through the air because I applied force, it went through the air because God did it. Obviously the first interpretation is the more logical one. The same logic applies to evolution. It is always more logical to assume natural causes then supernatural causes
2007-06-20
16:02:33
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality