If you read any of the questions on Pro-Life/Pro-Choice or talk to people about their views on the topic, you see that most people are not completely Pro-Life or Pro-Choice. People will say I am against abortion, because it kills innocent life, while you can then ask them if they are for the War, and they will say yes. Or you can talk to someone who is "Pro-Choice", that will say they are for Abortion but against the War.
I think that people need to pick a side and stick with it, if they are against abortion, they should also be against the war(Granted I am for the War only because I feel that if we run away from it, we will suffer more civilian casualties at home in the future.) Or if people are for killing unborn children, they should be for the War.
So why do people feel like they can take the "Best of both Worlds", and how can they justify being for both killing(Abortions or War), and saving life(Abortions or War)?(Respectively for "Pro-Life/Pro-Choice")
2007-05-23
09:56:07
·
32 answers
·
asked by
Bballoakie
3
in
Politics