DON'T TELL ME IF IT'S RIGHT OR WRONG, THAT IS NOT MY QUESTION! I WOULDN'T DO IT ANYWAY!
I am just curious if, legally speaking, you can get your infant tattooed... because it seems to me that if you can get your babies ears pierced, or get him circumcised, why not tattooed? And yet, it seems so wrong... so it makes me really wonder if it would be legal to do so.
If piercing is not child abuse, what is?
If circumcision isn't, what is?
I don't need answers to those questions, I want to illustrate my point that I'm not looking for the moral aspect of this, because it's obvious. I read another answer for the same question and all people said was "Why would you want to do that? That's sick!" "No, you shouldn't!" and the like. THAT'S NOT WHAT I WANT TO KNOW.
IS IT LEGAL?
2006-11-02
22:30:56
·
9 answers
·
asked by
FastFoodKnight
3
in
Law & Ethics