if we lived in a smart, civilised way, the Earth could probably have the current human population in a sustainable manner
the way we live today, it can probably only sustain about 1.5-2 billion human beings
now if everyone polluted and wasted as much as US citizens, then Earth could probably support a population of only 500 to 750 million
2006-11-02 22:34:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by AntoineBachmann 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
those anticipating a conflict cry to "shop the Earth" could locate it humbling that the planet is remarkably resilient and could stay to tell the tale us all. it incredibly is the destruction of the persons-friendly atmosphere, that skinny bubble of existence on earth's crust, that alarms scientists and thinkers and leaders from around the political and social spectrum. we've brewed up an atmosphere a growing to be type of adversarial to human existence with our commercial chemistry set. the essential message isn't new, however the action picture backs it up with a wealth of compelling evidence and arguments (and a few doubtful witnesses). directors Nadia Conners and Leila Conners Petersen connect the dots between environmental crises too oftentimes pronounced as remoted subject concerns and make the modest theory that we quit treating the planet in basic terms as belongings to be exploited. "The eleventh Hour" has not one of the attention-getting stunts of Michael Moore's thrilling and energetic productions, or the character and palpable pastime of Al Gore in "An Inconvenient actuality." The alarming evidence demands extra effective than a dutiful slide teach to awaken audiences to action, however the smart and provocative assembly of minds is in spite of the reality that compelling and annoying. climate substitute is just one symptom of the disease plaguing the planet. Others incorporate deforestation, air pollution, soil degradation, pollution interior the oceans and aquifers, and the speedy extinction of species. The planet, in basic terms like a ill human with a fever, is heating as much as kill the disease
2016-10-21 04:48:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A sustainable population for planet earh is that a population which does not harm the environment and destroy ecological balance.
2006-11-02 22:39:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by JACOB J 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
It depends on the level of technology. Earth today supports far more people than it could before agriculture was invented, for example.
2006-11-03 01:47:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Around 3 billion (destructive creatures) of us.
2006-11-04 00:39:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by CLIVE C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
people dont live for ever,the earth will be around longer than people, take care and live long
2006-11-02 22:35:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by thankuberry 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Have a look at this view: http://www.educate-yourself.org/nwo/nwopopcontrol.shtml
2006-11-02 22:34:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Barbara Doll to you 7
·
0⤊
0⤋