Boxing

Out of all six of the Rocky films in what order of preference would you put them,with your least fav at num.6

2007-01-19 13:18:26 · 14 answers · asked by mrs t 2

2007-01-19 13:14:54 · 4 answers · asked by danny l 1

I live near Trenton NJ and that's not far from Philadelphia Pa .... I was wonderng where the best place to get boxing lessons is ........ ( boxer ) Ali

2007-01-19 13:01:46 · 3 answers · asked by burlingtony 2

when was the last white american boxing world title holder...you look at the Brits and they have Calazaghie,Witter,Hatton...

2007-01-19 12:10:52 · 7 answers · asked by toni lee 3

Live or on TV ,Video , ETC.

2007-01-19 12:00:05 · 15 answers · asked by D-Day 3

I know Tyson held all of the belts at one time, I belive there are 4 belts now and I was wondering if anyone since Tyson has held all of the belts. I was also wondering if was to win them all whom it might be.I would also like to know what has made boxing fade out so much?

2007-01-19 09:13:05 · 6 answers · asked by Chris M 1

Ricky Hatton vs Juan Urango live from Las Vegas

2007-01-19 09:03:34 · 4 answers · asked by markurron 1

do you guys beleive he has a chance against pretty by floyd mayweather. I think if can stick his jab and keep him at a distance he has a chance because he is bigger and stronge than floyd. but he cant get in brawl with floyd because he is way faster than oscar.

2007-01-19 08:20:18 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-19 08:12:59 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Does anyone know how rocky 6 ends?
does he die?
is there room for a rocky 7?
i have not seen the movie yet, and my partner is going to see it without me tomorrow and i know he wont tell me the ending,
Is this the end of Rocky???

2007-01-19 08:11:36 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-19 08:06:20 · 10 answers · asked by Lordgloball 2

2007-01-19 08:00:22 · 2 answers · asked by artbowen2 1

Im talking hayday here ,so in your opinion who would win?
and explain why.

2007-01-19 07:14:30 · 4 answers · asked by genasinfo 2

Talk about overrated. 3 "alphabet soup champions" that lack skill,(the heavyweight division is in the sorriest most lackluster state it's been in since the early 1930's - pre Joe Louis) and charisma. Is there any new talent on the horizon that can help resurrect the marquee division in boxing, therefore creating more/new interest is this great sport. Once upon a time the man who held the heavyweight crown was known as the baddest man on the planet. With these "champions" lack of skill and more importantly CHARISMA, are these men the "anointed ones" to bring boxing back to the prominence it's once held in years past?

One more question why in the h*ll don't these 3 "champions" insist that their respective promoters match them against each other so we have a unified and undisputed heavyweight champion? You never saw the great champions of the past ducking each other. They wanted to be known as the undisputed heavyweight champion of the world. Why won't these three fight each other?

2007-01-19 06:48:56 · 10 answers · asked by Brent 5

2007-01-19 06:44:23 · 6 answers · asked by blackpool 1

2007-01-19 04:38:11 · 9 answers · asked by domefc1 1

15 rounds at featherweight in their prime

2007-01-19 04:36:43 · 4 answers · asked by toughguy2 7

Both in their prime at featherweight and 15 rounds

2007-01-19 04:34:58 · 5 answers · asked by toughguy2 7

featherweights in their prime and 15 rounds

2007-01-19 04:33:36 · 6 answers · asked by toughguy2 7

Featherweights in their prime and 15 rounds

2007-01-19 04:32:10 · 6 answers · asked by toughguy2 7

2007-01-19 03:09:24 · 6 answers · asked by Brent 5

He was the former world heavy champion boer

2007-01-19 02:43:11 · 16 answers · asked by Avril R 1

do you think boxers do well in mma. there have been a number of guys i have seen in ufc who havent done so well. best one is vitor belfort and even he isnt that good.

do you think that boxing skills are more important than muay thai in mma?

2007-01-19 02:36:03 · 5 answers · asked by Vikrant S 1

if both fighters could have fought in their primes who would win and why?

2007-01-19 02:03:12 · 10 answers · asked by TROLL 1

2007-01-19 01:52:30 · 7 answers · asked by zebbie g 2

Which Boxer has the best fighting stlyle right now

2007-01-19 00:23:38 · 9 answers · asked by Cayden 2

Have you ever noticed that whenever a question is asked about two caucasian boxers few if any avatars feature african am. users. Also, whenever somebody compares a caucasian boxer to an afro boxer all the afr. am. avatars choose the afro am. boxer. Take the ali vs. marciano question, almost all afr. am. avatars choose ali.

Whenever someone brings up the Russian Champions, there are constant put downs and delusions that Heavyweight boxing is dead. It seems like many users are in denial just because of the race of the current beltholders.

2007-01-18 22:08:34 · 9 answers · asked by jongcr 1

I had an Email exchange with an ignorant schmuck recently, who was another in the long line of Rocky Marciano cheerleaders that insists that Marciano was the greatest heavyweight that ever lived, because he was unbeaten.
My response was that by that moron logic, current WBA champ Nicolay Valuev is as good as Marciano was, because he's unbeaten, too.
That got me to thinking - who would win a hypothetical match-up?
Guess what? I think Valuev beats him. Valuev is just too damn big.
There's just no way a 189 pound man, with a 67" reach, standing at 5'11 inches tall would be able to reach, let alone beat, a man that towers over him at 7 ft, outreaches him at 80" and outweighs him by 139 pounds at 328.
Am I wrong? If I am, tell me why.

2007-01-18 15:19:23 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Hopkins only fought people lighter than him. Jermain taylor is a horrible fighter, who runs away from his opponent.

2007-01-18 15:08:43 · 6 answers · asked by jongcr 1

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 22
vCash: 500
Rep Power: 0 Leonrad and Duran

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I understand that in most polls Duran is rated higher than Leonard as an all time great. But why? I loved Duran. He is the number two greatest lightweight of all time (in my opinion) ..just behind (in a close one) to the great Henry Armstrong (who I believe would have outpointed Duran in a fight). I agree that Duran was one of the toughest fighters ever. But Leonard dominated him in their second meeting. Please do not say that Leonard clowned the entire fight. Actually, only in round 7 did he show off. And in their first fight, Leonard almost beat Duran at his own game. Leonard knocked out Hearns. Hearns destroyed Duran. Leonard beat Hagler (ok, I thought Hagler had retained his crown). But Duran surely did not beat Hagler (even though he fought very well against the marvelous one). Leonard won the welterweight,mid

2007-01-18 13:20:03 · 10 answers · asked by James R 1