STEVE NASH is OVERRATED!!!!?
I am on the verge of losing sleep due to the fact that he is winning MVP's over questionably two of the greatest players of all time when it's all said and done. If I just woke up from a coma and somebody told me that Kobe Bryant hasn't won an MVP yet, I would probably pass back out into another coma because it's completely sickening. It amazes me that, over the last few years, a mundane stat such as an assist has become more valuable of a stat than scoring points. Not only does the fate of an assist lie in the hands of the players around you (literally), but you can get an assist as effortlessly as making a two handed chest pass to James Jones and watching him make a three-pointer with a hand in his face. I'm tired of hearing the claim that Nash makes everybody on the floor a better player, because I am just not buying it. I believe it's the contrary, and that all of the players surrounding him lead to his success. I'd like to see how many of his assists are tallied directly from Amare Stoudemire and Shawn Marion baskets, because I'd be willing to bet it's well over half. I'm convinced Kornheiser could drop 10 dimes a game if he took Nash's place on that filthy Suns squad. It is a joke that Nash gets all this credit simply for being the primary ball handler on one of the best teams in the league. The thing is that I actually like Steve Nash and I think he's a great player, but I'm big on giving credit where it's due, and it's not due to Steve Nash. Recognizing the underdog is cute every once in awhile, but you have to draw the line at some point. If they're going to keep erroneously giving the MVP to Steve Nash, they should change the name of the damn award, because he is not the most valuable player in the league and everybody knows it. They might not say it, but they know it. It is so frustrating being an avid fan of the NBA and watching a player score 169 points in 3 games, and having it be disregarded because, for some reason, the best player in the league doesn't get the MVP award anymore. Can you imagine John Stockton winning the MVP over Michael Jordan, not only once but twice? Because that is the equivalent of the present scenario. If you took Kobe Bryant off the Lakers, they would struggle to be a .500 basketball team. If you took Steve Nash off the Suns, they would still be one of the best teams in the Western Conference. And it's not just Kobe Bryant. You could make a case for about ten better MVP candidates than Steve Nash over the last two years. It's not hard to see why everybody loves the guy, but come on. You would think a guy who has won the MVP two years in a row would be starting in the All-Star game. I'm pretty sure the MVP voting committee is screwed this year, because they almost have to give Nash one more undeserved trophy. He didn't deserve it last year, but they had to give it to him because he had a better season than the previous one, and the same thing is happening this year. Are we just going to keep giving this guy the MVP for outplaying himself? Another thing I want to call Steve Nash out on is being selfish. "What?!? A guy who gets 12 assists a game is selfish?!?" Yes I believe so. I don't see the difference between 1)a guy who ignores open shot opportunities and goes out of his way to get an assist to pad his stats, and 2)a guy who drives to the basket through three defenders for a dunk to pad his scoring stats. In my opinion, both guys are selfish. I was watching the game a few weeks ago where Nash had 4 points and 21 assists, and he was blatantly trying to get an absurd amount of assists. It looked like he told the team in the locker room before the game "Hey guys, try to get me a lot of assists tonight," because I'm pretty sure every player who recieved a pass from Nash in that game threw up a shot. Doesn't the significance of an assist become diminished if the player recording them is practicing unnatural means of getting them? And by unnatural, I mean playing out of control and completing one out of three behind the back passes in traffic, and getting glorified for the one that he successfully completes. There is a reason he leads all point guards in turnovers. Is that something an MVP is really supposed to do? Okay, I've been rambling for quite a bit, but that's just the way I feel. Am I truly insane or am I just thinking about this more rationally than most people seem to be? Either way I think the voting the results of the MVP voting the last two years has been an utter travesty.
2007-02-07
05:44:04
·
18 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous