After reading the definition of Terrorism, I realized that it is in fact
Terrorism:
As a form of unconventional warfare, terrorism is sometimes used when attempting to force political change by: convincing a government or population to agree to demands to avoid future harm or fear of harm, destabilization of an existing government, motivating a disgruntled population to join an uprising, escalating a conflict in the hopes of disrupting the status quo, expressing a grievance, or drawing attention to a cause.
Okay, the US is trying to convince Iraq’s civilians to come to their side rather than Saddams former beliefs/side-unconventional warfare. Early in the war a plane dropped off anti-Saddam propaganda telling of how he was living in wealth while they were suffering. They are trying to change their beliefs, practices, and politics to that of democracy. Those that do not abide or uprise are killed or imprisoned. The Iraq residents are disgruntled and the US is trying to convince them to turn to their side and to leave behind their Muslim religious beliefs. Muslim women are supposed to be subservient to their husbands and men, where head coverings, etc. The US is trying to convince them to have equal rights for females, etc. Much of the Iraq people don’t want us over there which gives them just cause to further attack us even over here in American soil. We are imposing our politics and religious beliefs on their country, and they in fact did NOT attack us. People forget that Bin Laden attacked us from Iran. We found no Weapons of Mass Destructions and the Iraq people are NOT being freed but rather imprisoned by US military presence and politics. We have no right to be over there. But if we leave now, they will be in greater chaos than with Saddam.
What do you think?
2007-05-23
12:54:27
·
13 answers
·
asked by
trinitybombshella
2