I've seen it happening from boths sides - Christians who claim to have proof that God exists, and Aitheists who claim the opposite.
As was pointed out to me last week it impossible to disprove, but that does not mean he definitly does exist. Similarly, there is no solid evidence that he does exist, but that does not prove that he doesn't.
I have had intellegent conversations with both Aitheists (philosophically) and Christians (theologically) on this subject, but only when words like "proof" and "facts" are avoided.
It seems to me that science can contribute nothing to a theological discussion - it is like trying to use a calculator to write a song. I mean no offence to those who still try to do it, but can anyone explain to me why?
2007-02-27
22:06:01
·
24 answers
·
asked by
dm300570
2