I'm firmly of the opinion that a belief is logically unjustified if it's supported by neither reason nor evidence, and faith is a "belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence", as dictionary.com says. However, religious folks sometimes claim that faith *does* constitute evidence... or at least, constitutes a valid reason to believe in something. How is this possible? Faith, to me, is a belief which has no connection with reality and is therefore self-defeating, since we could equally well have faith in both the existence *and* non-existence of a thing, with absolutely no way of knowing which was true. What's the use in that? How can faith in a thing be evidence of the very thing you have faith in? If that were so then we could wish anything at all into existence just by believing in it sincerely enough, and that is clearly nonsense.
Anyone like to have a go at clearing this up for me?
2006-07-11
12:15:04
·
31 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous