Follow up from this question,
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AuF9apqpOGoC6zZSSfz_PQvsy6IX?qid=20060720105912AA9BOvy
People are telling me that they read Genesis 2.7 and it doesn't say God used all the dust of the ground. That is pretty clear to me also. So why is it that Christians ask, and its not all Christians, just some, they ask why if man evolved from monkeys, are there still monkeys? Isn't it possible that if God made man using monkeys, that he didn't use all the monkeys to make man?
To be "scientific" if man evolved from a common ancestor/monkey/ape, man didn't evolve from ALL the common ancestors, monkeys, apes, but that the man evolved from only a FEW of them, wouldn't this be equal the response and logic of "Genesis 2.7 doesn't say ALL of the dust".
2006-07-20
07:14:01
·
23 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality