English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Physics - November 2006

[Selected]: All categories Science & Mathematics Physics

Surely if it was purely random/chaos you would eventually see shapes and/or blocks of colour? So is there a reason why you don't see this?

2006-11-24 02:04:29 · 6 answers · asked by James J 1

Just wondering.... he said, you drop two things at once, from same hight and that they will hit floor at the same time. Two words.... Helium balloon.

Have i just proven a famous theory wrong?

2006-11-24 01:52:48 · 5 answers · asked by Aled H 3

does an object always have the same mass and length?

2006-11-24 01:47:45 · 6 answers · asked by lavenderedolphinluvermashimaro89 2

2006-11-24 01:43:13 · 13 answers · asked by Curious George 1

Do you think that physics will ever be complete in the sense that there will no longer be any need for theoretical and experimental research in physics?

2006-11-24 01:35:04 · 9 answers · asked by lavenderedolphinluvermashimaro89 2

If high pressure increases velocity of fluid, how does fluid flow faster when the pressure is lower?

2006-11-24 01:24:38 · 3 answers · asked by Sir Guitarist 2

Ie flying from one point of the globe to the exact opposite point - does the earth spin inside the atmosphere have any effect on the direction you take?

2006-11-24 01:05:11 · 7 answers · asked by MonkeyLab 2

The MOS capacitor ( we used Al for metal,silicon for semiconductor)which we built can work until Mhz frequencies.Why do not we get capacitance at Ghz frequencies?

2006-11-24 00:41:51 · 3 answers · asked by seawave 2

2006-11-24 00:19:27 · 10 answers · asked by Nik 1

2006-11-23 23:59:10 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

Let's suppose to be an astronaut travelling in the free space, without any gravitational force on you and without any near object to understand your current speed. Suddenly, a star appears at your backs and you start falling on it with a strong acceleration. Would you notice it?

2006-11-23 23:49:58 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-23 23:40:45 · 5 answers · asked by che 1

-do protons decay?
-Why is there far more matter than antimatter in the universe?
-Why did the universe have such low entropy in the past, resulting in the distinction between past and future and the second law of thermodynamics? Why does time flow in one direction at all, on macroscopic scales, when there does not seem to be an arrow of time on the scale of fundamental interactions?

2006-11-23 22:45:09 · 10 answers · asked by Andrew J 1

2006-11-23 20:32:16 · 6 answers · asked by Jick nathan 1

2006-11-23 17:59:11 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

Posted to me by my teacher. Any suggestions?

2006-11-23 17:36:29 · 6 answers · asked by N 1

To measure the static friction coefficient between a 1.9 kg block and a vertical wall, the setup shown in the drawing is used. A spring (spring constant = 470 N/m) is attached to the block. Someone pushes on the end of the spring in a direction perpendicular to the wall until the block does not slip downward. If the spring in such a setup is compressed by 0.053 m, what is the coefficient of static friction?

2006-11-23 17:07:21 · 2 answers · asked by Jim E 1

When the rubber band in a slingshot is stretched, it obeys Hooke's law. Suppose that the "spring constant" for the rubber band is k = 54 N/m. When the rubber band is pulled back with a force of 7.9 N, how far does it stretch? (answer in meters)

2006-11-23 17:06:24 · 3 answers · asked by Jim E 1

2006-11-23 17:00:58 · 4 answers · asked by sreedeviravindranadhankollara... 1

in the wood and causes it to swing upward to a height of 0.1m. If the mass of the wood block is 2kg, What was the initial speed of the bullet?

2006-11-23 16:46:54 · 5 answers · asked by suhel 1

2006-11-23 16:42:10 · 9 answers · asked by teo 1

In the Galapagos Islands at the equator, the acceleration of a freely falling body is 9.780m/s^2, while at he latitude of Oslo, Norway, it is 9.831m/s^2. why does the acceleration differ?

2006-11-23 16:31:56 · 8 answers · asked by suhel 1

Newton's third law, the wagon exerts an equal and opposite force of 400N. Since the two forces are in opposite directions, why don't they cancel each other and produce zero acceleration?

2006-11-23 16:21:39 · 2 answers · asked by suhel 1

2006-11-23 16:17:41 · 13 answers · asked by Nautilus 2

because according to the string theory, universes sometimes touch each other, Im jus wondering whether we see these "ghosts" at that precise moment when the universes touch?

Im not on DRUGS!! I just sometimes wonder about these things, am I weird or do any of you share or understand what Im saying here?

2006-11-23 13:50:27 · 20 answers · asked by PrinceOfDarkness 2

Let's say a ball is suspended in the air by a rope with a surface beneath the ball.

I then allow the ball to fall so that it is now half-way to the surface, and I continue doing this so that every time I let it fall, it is half-way closer to the surface than it was before. Common sense -- even the laws of physics -- tell you that eventually, that ball will have to touch the surface.

This is where I reach my dilema. If you keep allowing the ball to fall half-way to the surface, then it should be PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for that ball to touch the surface.

or...

Is there a point where there is no such thing as half? (The ball is so close to the surface that to drop it another half-way would be impossible because it has to touch eventually.)

Please, please help me!! I asked my physics teacher and he told me that he doesn't know and I'm dying to know!

2006-11-23 13:24:46 · 18 answers · asked by cve5190 4

A gymnast is performing a floor routine. In a tumbling run she spins through the air, increasing her angular velocity from 3.00 to 5.20 rev/s while rotating through one-half of a revolution. How much time does this maneuver take?

2006-11-23 13:18:17 · 5 answers · asked by Any help? 1

fedest.com, questions and answers