I consider as basic science the mathematics. But after this , the physics seems the more basic science. I understand that people prefer consider physics as basic science since it is more realistic than maths
2006-11-23 23:43:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by maussy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think many physicists feel like eventually a theory in physics will emerge which will encompass everything in the universe. That includes all of the other sciences. Also all of the other sciences need physics to exist, but the reverse is not neccesarily true.
What I mean is: If the universe had formed with different values of physics then the other sciences might not apply anymore, but physics would still be there just a little different.
You could also say everything in the universe is the result of physical interaction of things (atoms, molecules, fluids, objects, planets, galaxies, galaxie clusters) and that is what physics deals with. Everything else is more specialized and some would say trivial
2006-11-23 23:55:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is just me. I think physics is the basic science because it seeks to answer the most fundamental questions in nature such as like what is charge? what is mass? why is there mass? what is force? what is energy? how much work will be done if...? what is gravity? how did the universe begin? The questions other sciences seek to address are basically complications of the questions physics seek to ask. If the questions of physics cannot be answered, there seems to be only metaphysics left to attempt at an answe. But metaphysics is not a science. But the questions of, for example, chemistry, can be addressed by physics. Such as when chemists ask, why does the table of elements work? Physicts answered it through quantum mechanics. When geologists wanted to find the mechanism for the tectonics of plates, physicts came up with the conveyor belt theory, among others. When astronomers wanted to know why certain stars acted the way they do, physicsts where also the one trying to find it out. When biologists wanted to know the probabilities of arriving at a certain physique, physicits where again the ones to attempt at an anser. What more, math is the language of physics. Math is abstact and real numbers are simply to be found in the real number line. Physics made concerete predictions out of these abstraction. And even the question of math application was answered by phsysics. So without physics, math is not a science at all, but simply a philosophy or train of logic. In effect, the findings of physics is applied to all the other sciences, natural or otherwise. The laws of physics are also applicable to all natural sciences, while, for example, the laws of biology are for biology alone.
I believe, though, that chemistry is the central science, since its findings are used by all other sciences, such as the earth sciences and biology.
2006-11-23 23:50:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by pecier 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
everything that around were made by experience and of course also physics. For example, the runways at the airport hav some small of bitumen because when the airplane runs on the runways, it makes the road hotter and the road will expend, it's easy to get break if there's no hole of bitumen.My English is not really good, sorry if u don't undersatnd
2006-11-23 23:46:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by english_improve 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
it may be considered a uncomplicated technological information because of the fact all different sciences derive from it. Chemistry relies upon on understanding the form of atoms and how they have interplay (physics) and biology relies upon on chemistry. Physics is considered needed for that reason.
2016-10-13 00:38:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋