English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Physics - September 2006

[Selected]: All categories Science & Mathematics Physics

didnt gravity bend light?

2006-09-06 05:10:13 · 8 answers · asked by goring 6

By the time you answer this question if you answer this question it will have been asked by someone in the past written by someone in the future. How is that for time travel...............?

2006-09-06 05:09:39 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-06 05:01:15 · 5 answers · asked by goring 6

is further away like 1 foot away from the eyes makes every thing clear thus upside down.

2006-09-06 04:56:43 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

if an object is moving in a circle why doesnt it accelerate towards the centre if there is a resultant force and how does it move in a circle if the resultant force is pointing towards the centre? i mean doesnt it just move towards the centre?? How does it change direction only and not speed while a resultant force acting on it??

2006-09-06 04:47:39 · 9 answers · asked by I need Answers 5

visible means we can see light. then why i can only one the walls, why i can not see the path.

2006-09-06 04:26:12 · 12 answers · asked by srinivasakarthikeya r 1

Is glass really a solid or a liquid? I've seen old glass that looked like it was dripping, but it was still really hard. And how can a liquid crack? Also, if it was a liquid, how come we can't put our hand or foot or whatever through it easily like we can with water? Yeah we can do it easily but it'd break. I think it's a solid, but I am curious to know other's opinions.

2006-09-06 04:13:17 · 27 answers · asked by D-Beat Dee 2

2006-09-06 04:08:13 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Since General relativity deal basically in accelerated systems(Non Inertial)?

2006-09-06 04:07:59 · 5 answers · asked by goring 6

2006-09-06 04:03:49 · 3 answers · asked by pranjal s 1

Since General relativity deal basically in accelerated systems(Non Inertial)?

2006-09-06 03:57:57 · 2 answers · asked by goring 6

Am i too believe that my future hasnt yet been written? Like a surfer standing on the edge of a wave moving unsteadily into the unknown. If i were to travel into the past wouldnt that person think that HIS future was unwritten as well? Since i am from his future i know its not. Logically if i can see the past then someone from my future can see me( in picture or book of course) which means my future is already set.(Unless i was to recieve some foreknowledge about my future). Thinking that we are the forefront of history is like thinking the sun orbits around the earth, its silly. We are only a point in history. Some would call this predestination. The mere fact that i can remember the past leads me to believe that perhaps some where in the future someone is doing the same about me. If this is all true then time travel should be possible in both direction. What does this have do with you? What do you think? Its your life, your...future(So to speak).

2006-09-06 03:23:31 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-06 03:21:44 · 20 answers · asked by Red Bird 1

I've heard that if time travel is ever possible the furthest you'll be able to go back in time is to whenever the time machine was created.
Also if I'm going to put a message in a safe why hasnt anyone visited me yet. It either means I dont ever put the message in a safe, time travel isnt possible, I dont ever have any family or my future descendents dont care or dont have access to a time machine.

2006-09-06 03:14:06 · 7 answers · asked by pharoah_ed 2

2006-09-06 03:13:27 · 6 answers · asked by goring 6

2006-09-06 03:10:08 · 13 answers · asked by rajendra k 2

A person who is properly constrained by an over-the-shoulder seat belt has a good chance of surviving a car collision of the deceleration does not exceed about 30 "g's" (1.0 g = 9.8 m/s2). Assuming uniform deceleration of this value, calculate the distance over which the front end of the car must be designed to collapse if a crash brings the car to a rest from 100 km/h.

2006-09-06 02:48:56 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-06 02:16:29 · 1 answers · asked by abcde 1

I need like "Issac Newton and Force for Dummies" kinds of crap.. I've got a test tomorrow and when it comes to Science, I'm completely clueless!!! I also need the equivalent of one Newton and the formulas for conversion.

THANKS TO WHOEVER ANSWERS CORRECTLY!!!!

2006-09-06 02:10:54 · 5 answers · asked by xXanythingbutinnocentXx 2

Something related to 3rd and 2nd law of motion, I think so !

2006-09-06 01:39:12 · 13 answers · asked by malu 2

2006-09-06 01:33:40 · 3 answers · asked by hyperthreadinguy 2

Why is the primary and secondary winding on the same limb?

2006-09-06 01:21:57 · 1 answers · asked by panther 1

Can you please help me?

Thanks alot!!!!

2006-09-06 00:59:54 · 9 answers · asked by !!!!!! 1

Given that:
Water of depth 10 m exerts a pressure equal to atmospheric pressure.
An air bubble reaches the surface of a lake which is 20 m deep.
How can we know that the pressure at the bottom of the lake is 3 times of the atmospheric pressure? I am rather clueless...
Thanks. Your help would be great.

2006-09-06 00:47:46 · 4 answers · asked by unquenchablethirst 2

2006-09-06 00:46:34 · 5 answers · asked by Rickster12 1

Water of depth 10 m exerts a pressure equal to the atmospheric pressure. An air bubble rises to the surface of the lake which is 20 m deep. When the bubble reaches the surface, its volume is 6 cm3.

What was the volume of the air bubble at the bottom of the lake?

2006-09-06 00:21:00 · 6 answers · asked by unquenchablethirst 2

2006-09-06 00:03:11 · 6 answers · asked by punkpinaii19 1

fedest.com, questions and answers