Do transitional fossils prove evolution? Does those who believe in evolution commit the logical fallacy of affirming the consequent?
Here is a quote from an article that I found on the website of California Academy of Sciences by the title" "Fish Out Of Water" the article states that "the bones inside animal’s forward fins provide evidence of arms in the making" Read the full article here: http://www.calacademy.org/science_now/headline_science/fossil_fish.php
So the argument is this as I understand it:
If evolution is true than transitional fossils will be found
The tiktaalik is a transitional fossil since it has a bone inside of its forward fins which provide evidence of arms in making.
Therefore evolution is true
An example of the same fallace:
If it's raining then the streets are wet.
The streets are wet.
Therefore, it's raining.
In symbolic form it looks like this
If p then q.
q.
Therefore, p
to learn more about this fallacy go to http://www.fallacyfiles.org/afthecon.ht
2007-11-16
15:59:46
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Wind203
4