English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If yes, please give me some examples. Do all scientific theories are constructed based on inductive arguments?
thanks a lot

2007-11-17 07:42:26 · 3 answers · asked by Wind203 4 in Science & Mathematics Other - Science

3 answers

Both. The same with all scientific theories, inductive reasoning is necessary for coming up with laws and theories, while deductive arguments are necessary for producing *evidence* for the validity of those laws and theories.

Inductive reasoning is going from specific observations to general conclusions. Darwin first arrived at the theory of natural selection through inductive reasoning:

1. - All finches on island A are well adapted for the food supply for island A ... while all finches on island B are well adapted for food supply for island B.
2. - The finches on islands A and B cannot reproduce with each other (i.e. reproduce in the environment in which they live).
3. (General conclusion:) All all species are adapted to the environment in which they reproduce.

Deductive arguments allows us to take general claims to make specific predictions. This allows us to search for *evidence* for general theories (like evolution) constructed from inductive arguments:

1. (General premise:) All species are adapted to the environment in which they reproduce.
2. (Specific prediction) We should expect to find many species that are uniquely suited to their environment.

Second example:

Inductive:
1. (Specific) Island finches are related by common ancestry to mainland finches.
2. (General) All species are related to each other by common ancestry.

Deductive:
1. (General) All species are related to each other by common ancestry.
2. (Specific) In all species, we should expect to find common genetic/molecular evidence of common ancestry. (And indeed we do.)

So in a way, a *hypothesis* is constructed using inductive reasoning. But it becomes a *theory* by subjecting it to tests produced by deductive reasoning.

So a theory (like evolution) is constructed from both.

2007-11-17 10:01:25 · answer #1 · answered by secretsauce 7 · 2 0

Its inductive. Just like all theories, scientific or otherwise.

Examples:
Fossils are one argument that supports evolution
Carbon dating
DNA analysis
Embryo something
Biogeography
ETC...

2007-11-17 15:48:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No.

Deductive.

While Darwins original papers were inductive, molecular evolution as observed in experiments today is purely deductive.

2007-11-17 15:58:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers