The trouble with evolution is that it has only been tested in the court of human opinion. The trouble with the court of human opinion is that it can't really test anything - all you need here is for one body of evidence to seem more logical that another. In the case of the origin of life, if you prevent enough people from believing in God, evolution seems logical. However, if you tested evolution in a court of law, we would have to be more sceptical.
Key types of evidence may be required in a court of law: eye witnesses, forensic evidence and legal documentation (or any other type of doc.) In each of these areas, evidence is lacking. There are no eye witnesses to a single evolutionary event. Darwin's evidence points to variation, not speciation. The forensic evidence, fossils, points to sudden appearance and disappearance of distinct species, not gradual changes. There is no document of any kind that hints at evolution except that which has been published by modern evolutionists.
2006-11-15
08:51:17
·
19 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous