I have been asking this question in different ways, but I am still not getting a satisfactory answer. We have some mechanisms for evolution in some populations in laboratory experiments. There is more than that in the evolution theory, but let's focus on that. To be interesting, these mechanisms in these specific populations must generalize to all the family tree in real life. So, they must be quite complex mechanisms. Some say they can be reduced to chemistry & physics. We might believe this, but I don't think we have actually proved that -- and a reduction is not something where evidence is enough, it is a mathematical process. So, how do we know that known physics & chemistry is enough? When evolutionists insist that there is a reduction, I am thinking that may be the model for the family tree is much simpler than I think, and there is not so much complexity. So, I try to see what it is formally, but I only got answers about religions, etc. Please no discussion about religions.
2007-08-23
07:53:54
·
6 answers
·
asked by
My account has been compromised
2