English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Astronomy & Space - September 2006

[Selected]: All categories Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

2006-09-23 09:13:31 · 3 answers · asked by nehulya 1

2006-09-23 08:58:51 · 10 answers · asked by mrblue_1986 1

I have always read that if Jupiter had been of sufficient size it may have formed a small dwarf star. I understand star forming dynamics and the star is determined by its mass. It is not like a stars say, " get out of here all you not hydrogen and helium molecules." there still has to be residual larger elements within the star. I imagine most would be in a plasma state because of the intense heat and energy. Some molecules when given enough time and pressure crystalize like carbon becoming a diamond. Would these heavier elements become compacted in the center of a star? If so, I guess you could change the color of the star by adding enough mass. (It would need alot though)

2006-09-23 08:39:20 · 4 answers · asked by Colonel Chaos 2

2006-09-23 08:09:54 · 11 answers · asked by pathfinder 1

i saw it from the daily breeze and i would like to know what's your opinion about it.

2006-09-23 08:03:43 · 6 answers · asked by oliro2004 1

My source is Nasa but I can't direct you to it because it is on m hard disk. It is 1.24 miles across and would be the equivalent of a 1 million megaton explosion if the worst happens.

2006-09-23 07:49:15 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-23 07:22:05 · 17 answers · asked by Kat W 2

2006-09-23 06:24:52 · 1 answers · asked by minnn_theino 1

2006-09-23 05:12:49 · 16 answers · asked by Melissa D 1

2006-09-23 05:00:39 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-23 04:38:53 · 23 answers · asked by Kat W 2

2006-09-23 04:30:06 · 5 answers · asked by goring 6

1. it gives off more heat that the sun provides
2. it's mostly gas (if not all)

(move over Pluto)

2006-09-23 04:06:59 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-23 03:26:03 · 15 answers · asked by themad 1

if the universe is expanding at an accelerating pace then there may be some parts that are travelling faster than the speed of light relative to us.

2006-09-23 03:25:41 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Was the landing on the moon one big hoax?

2006-09-23 03:23:11 · 14 answers · asked by kissthesky98 1

2006-09-23 03:01:33 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-23 01:17:04 · 15 answers · asked by dr faisal 1

i want to know how we are able to live there? how it help earth from destruction? is it possible for us to live in space? if we can how? please remember to send your replies by sunday evening.becoz i need it urgently. hope u all will co-operate with me and help me to find a solution

2006-09-23 01:04:39 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-22 23:43:03 · 15 answers · asked by Yahia M 2

can any one answer in a
scientifc way, even scientist in nasa cannot answer my
question ,beause present science is 20 persent missing
from scientist eyes

2006-09-22 23:37:40 · 4 answers · asked by truedream 1

chemstry+physcis - theory of everything

2006-09-22 23:14:32 · 7 answers · asked by truedream 1

Like 'Mikly Way', 'Galaxy' & 'Mars Bar'. Why have we done this? There must be better names out there! Can you think of any?

2006-09-22 23:04:28 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers