Old argument? Sorry. Okay, creation science notwithstanding, I was looking into this idea of the "big bang" and was directed to this not-a-creation-science website, which states that the big bang is not the only theory for understanding the history of the universe, but that researchers who do not use its framework as a basis for understanding are vastly underfunded, so that true scientific inquiry is being undermined. They state: "Giving support only to projects within the big bang framework undermines a fundamental element of the scientific method -- the constant testing of theory against observation. Such a restriction makes unbiased discussion and research impossible." http://www.cosmologystatement.org/
Please look into this website and assess the validity of these scientists' position, and let me (and Answers) know where to find information on the "other theories".
2006-10-30
02:43:33
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Astronomy & Space