The formation of 'walls' of superclusters of galaxies exist further in spacetime and beyond the limits of time placed upon the susposed time-point of origin of the 'Big Bang.' Given that it takes additional billions of years for stars to form, organize into clusters and form a galaxy, let alone clusters of galaxies then superclusters of millions or billions of galaxies, would their existence beyond the time frame of the susposed 'Big Bang' theory exclude this theory and beg that another theory be hypothesized in its place to explain this observational data? Is this not how science works - formulate a hypothesis, test it with experimentation and observation, adjust the theory or discard it if the observation or empirical data proves that the hypothesis is invalid?! Ithought pondering a little cosmology was in order. RTT
2006-06-13
07:05:27
·
3 answers
·
asked by
R. T. T.
1
in
Astronomy & Space