English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 26 November 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

let me make it clear. I AM NOT A RACIST. i am an immigrant from Nigeria i speak a different language too(well, a little) and i belive in every single thing America stands for. But i sorta think there should be a limit to diversity.
They have also opposed building a boarder fence because it "Disrupts the ecosystem of the of the wild animals that live in the desert", and thats where this story come
(You have to read this to understand what I am saying. This article came out today)
http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071126/NATION/111260034/1001

recently, thanks to the ACLU, there have been sparks of racism. look at this. Last month, the Salvation army fired some undocumented mexicans workers because they couldnt speak english, therefore cant really help. HOWEVER guess who came to the rescue?? oh yes, the ACLU. despite the fact that the founder Roger Baldwin of the ACLU was a communist and founded the union based on soviet-like agendas. i think its only a matter of time before Americans gets over dependent on the ACLU to tell them when their rights are violated, then the communism inspired organization whips out its own agenda.
in a democrat debate a few months ago, the democrats all said that they support America becoming a Bi-lingual nation. if america stands for equality, then what about the arabic, african, dutch, chinese immigrants that have to learn english to survive here in America?

2007-11-26 10:36:39 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-26 10:35:19 · 11 answers · asked by life 2

2007-11-26 10:13:35 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

"I’m pleased to be with you this evening to talk about the anti-immigrant movement in America, and why I believe this movement endangers the single most important reason for American greatness, namely, the renewal, reformation and reawakening that’s provided by the continuous flow of immigrants.”

more~~~

Giuliani continued: “I believe the anti-immigrant movement in America is one of our most serious public problems.” It can “be seen in legislation passed by Congress and the president.” (Republicans had just passed a welfare reform law that restricted benefits to legal immigrants.) “It can be seen in the negative attitudes being expressed by many of the politicians.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/23/opinion/23brooks.html?_r=1&ex=1353560400&en=24cd04e284d785b6&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&oref=slogin

2007-11-26 10:12:58 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-26 09:56:58 · 22 answers · asked by Choco 3

planted questions at Hillary rallies?

Think this will make MiniTrue's list of daily talking points to Rush, Sean and the other propogandists?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071126/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/fema_fake_news_conference

2007-11-26 09:53:33 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is it OK because a blonde haired, blue-eyed, Christian, Anglo/Saxon, Conservative Republican American said this phrase?

That would be Ann Coulter.

Is this the consensus for the Republican Christian Coalition in America?

2007-11-26 09:52:00 · 10 answers · asked by Kelly B 4

2007-11-26 09:46:33 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-26 09:36:26 · 34 answers · asked by stacy 1

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/11/26/iraq.bride/index.html

2007-11-26 09:30:00 · 13 answers · asked by The President 3

a Women, an African American or a Hispanic?

2007-11-26 09:28:53 · 8 answers · asked by Tx Guy 3

Why are they all silent now? Is it because they live in Malibu and the Hamptons and never really bought into antiwar messages in the first place?

2007-11-26 09:26:06 · 14 answers · asked by commonsense 5

Our population is rising rapidly. The estimated projection for 2050 is 10 billion people. Surely soon our natural resources will not be able to support such a vast population. Surely soon many people will have to be wiped out or many will face huge adjustments to their lives.

2007-11-26 09:18:20 · 15 answers · asked by Aaron S 2

I read something for school that said democrats generally want to increase taxes, and that republicans generally want to cut taxes because it helps the economy. How would cutting taxes help the economy? I would think the government would want more money.
clear this up for me.

2007-11-26 09:16:49 · 17 answers · asked by aefhskjrfhskjghskjrghw289utghwsr 2

2007-11-26 09:06:44 · 37 answers · asked by noituloeve maerd 2

i was just wondering if someone found any of these websites that they talk about in the news because it seems impossible to me that america controls all internet data transfers and websites and yet they can't find the locations of these websites? i can't believe americans made the internet and they have no idea how to use it!! i bet a couple of hackers can find those terrorists, because the govrn't cant!!!

2007-11-26 08:56:54 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

This act H.R. 1955 would virtually give our government the power to arrest, prosecute and incarcerate ANY AMERICAN CITIZEN who voices opposition to the U.S. Government for any reason, not merely domestic terrorists and violent political radicals.

For example, if you publicly disagreed with the U.S. Government for committing unconstitutional acts, then YOU could be considered a domestic terrorist or a political radical, at least. This is not merely a bad piece of legislation, it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and a DIRECT THREAT to our FREEDOM.

http://www.petitiononline.com/19551959/petition.html

2007-11-26 08:55:04 · 12 answers · asked by Fedup Veteran 6

I'm sure you'd rather not, but here it is anyway.

In 2001, the United States National Academy of Sciences was commissioned by the Bush administration to assess the current understanding of global climate change. Its report, published in June 2001, stated:
“The IPCC’s conclusion that most of the observed warming of the last 50 years is likely to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations accurately reflects the current thinking of the scientific community on this issue.”

"[T]he overwhelming majority of scientists who work on climate change agree on the main
points, even if there is still some uncertainty about particular aspects, such as how the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere will change in the future."

http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/downloaddoc.asp?id=1630

Oh wait, I forgot you don't like to read. No wonder you've never seen the proof.

2007-11-26 08:49:27 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Who is a REAL conservative, patriot, business man, with some actual experience in the middle east???
Where is the one, when we need him, like now???
Where is ROSS PEROIT???

2007-11-26 08:38:00 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

1) decrease the number of families on welfare by 60%
2) decrease unemployment by 50%
3) lower the poverty rate by 30%
4) lower teen pregnancies by 20% and decrease the number of abortions
5) stop the growth of out of wedlock births
6) increase support of children by dead-beat dads by 80%

What kind of president could possibly be this Republican dream?

2007-11-26 08:35:02 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

15

Im in high school, and my class has a phone interview with Noam Chomsky on Friday.

My teacher wants the class to come up with 3 questions each to ask him

The problem is, I cant think of anything to ask.

If you were going to ask Mr. Chomsky a question[s], what would it they be?

Im basically asking for questions to ask him because I cant think of any

Thanks!

2007-11-26 08:31:23 · 9 answers · asked by No Gods, No Masters 7

I don't know anyone rich or poor who likes to pay taxes, Ron Paul will lower taxes, whats the problem?

2007-11-26 08:15:48 · 14 answers · asked by noituloeve maerd 2

. . . Say 100 to 2,000 years from now. If humans are still on earth (just thinking positive).

2007-11-26 08:09:54 · 8 answers · asked by l1 1

2007-11-26 08:08:27 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers