Politics - 7 November 2007

iranian people legitimized their regime and radicalism can increase. so, does it rational policy ? I know that there is many iranian people who hate their regime. but, the US makes them weak and islamic nationalism has increased

2007-11-07 04:06:10 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

An Israeli doctor said, "Medicine in my country is so advanced, we can take a kidney out of one person, put it in another and have him looking for work in six weeks."

A German doctor said "That's nothing! In Germany, we can take a lung out of one person, put it in another and have him looking for work in four weeks."

A Russian doctor said, "In my country, medicine is so advanced, we can take half a heart from one person, put it in another and have them both looking for work in two weeks."

The American doctor, not to be outdone, said "Hah! We are about to take an asshole out of Texas, put him in the White House and half the country will be looking for work the next day."

2007-11-07 04:04:20 · 14 answers · asked by **mum to a little miracle** 4

because, Iran is not small fish as Iraq. Although, there is theocracy dictatorship, the US must do good diplomacy with Iran. Ahmedinejat is more moderate than Khomania.

2007-11-07 03:52:27 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

...good or bad ur voice shall be heard...

2007-11-07 03:45:34 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-07 03:44:03 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-07 03:37:57 · 9 answers · asked by Darth Vader 6

House Republicans tried to force debate on impeachment of Chency and the Dems ducked the issue, referring it to a committee.

2007-11-07 03:31:56 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

OK if the U.S. was never a country and never came into being
what nationality or culture or country would your part of North America be ruled governed by would you want to be a citezen of that country why or why not

There are at least 7 nations that could still have governed North America..

2007-11-07 03:29:24 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

do you have any idea?

2007-11-07 03:28:24 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Chinese government announced today that it plans to dump $1.4 trillion USD on the international currency exchange in favor of the more stable Euro.
This move will flood the currency market with USD and drive the value of the dollar down much further than the all time low it is now.
The effects of this move will be hard felt here in the USA. Anyone care to predict the outcome?
Will we see $200 a barrel oil by January?
Is this a good time to trade your USD for Canadian money?

2007-11-07 03:26:47 · 15 answers · asked by Overt Operative 6

America's growing dependence on foreign oil is a dangerous threat to our national security. Much of the global oil supply is located in unstable nations and the burden on our military to safeguard access to that oil increases daily. According to military and security experts, the most effective and efficient way to achieve greater energy independence and increase our national security is for Congress to pass energy legislation that increases how far our cars and trucks can go on a tank of gas.

Right now Congress is crafting the final version of legislation that could cut our oil use by increasing the vehicle fuel mileage standard to a fleetwide average of 35 mpg by 2020. If passed, these standards would reduce our country's oil consumption by 1.2 million barrels a day, more than twice the amount we currently import from Iraq. But, the auto companies are fighting this increase, pressuring lawmakers to weaken or delay energy legislation.

2007-11-07 03:24:42 · 6 answers · asked by courage 6

After all, Chirac was right and Bush was wrong. Saddam DID comply, and there were NO weapons of mass destruction.

You'd hope Bush would be big enough to admit when he was wrong.

2007-11-07 03:22:58 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

If you have heard some of her policy thoughts, it should have.
She says 'We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good". and there are many more Marxist ideas in her thoughts. I am not sure our great country can survive 4 or 8 years of her presidency. Prepare yourself for election day!

2007-11-07 03:22:31 · 42 answers · asked by groundhog 3

Doesn't 'blocking' another seem antithetical to a Q&A format, or am I missing the point of the tool?

2007-11-07 03:19:55 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Presidential directive 51 - gives the President absolute authority the US becomes a full fledged facist police state


Do you think that Cheney and or Bush would nuke their own nation just to be able to have absolute power ?

2007-11-07 03:19:53 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

What would happen if All the workers have had enough of being paid minium wages, and having their working conditions eroded under Howard' Liberal Government's Work Choices desided to leave,

All of them nation wide to work for themselves what would happen to those big multi national companies with no workers ?

Because its the worker who makes the companies the money that they like so much, and pay so little if they could get away with it ,Under work choices they can get away with it.

Austaralia Questions

2007-11-07 03:18:02 · 8 answers · asked by the.texican 3

Vice President =Barak Obama
Secretary of State=Jessie Jackson
Secreatary of Defense=Wesley Clark
Attorney General=John Edwards
Secretary of Education=Oprah Whinfrey
Home Land Security=John Kerry
Treasury Dept=Ted Kennedy
Housing/social Service=Al Sharpton
Suergeon General=Nancy Pelosci

2007-11-07 03:15:53 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

n?

When replying to critical argument of bushs war they say... why dont you serve, I did so screw off.
lol
Or even when critical of republicans actions they just reply with the same rhetoric.

thats super. You served.
That doesn't put anyone above critique and it doesn't "guarantee" respect especially if none is given.

2007-11-07 03:15:05 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

This seems to go against the libertarian doctrine. Clinton's affair was a private matter that he lied about. Bush's taking us into an unjust war was a public matter that he lied about.

I like Paul's views on foreign relations and a smaller government. The impeachment question really bothers me.

2007-11-07 03:09:53 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Free speech is limited on Yahoo Answers and profane images or language is prohibited .
You will lose the privilege to use this site should you violate the rules .
Does this effect how you answer a question or ask it , considering that some speech that is offensive makes your point more crystal clear .

2007-11-07 03:07:16 · 16 answers · asked by TroubleMaker 5

If they eat steak and lobster, then where is their government getting the money to feed them so well?
If they're eating cabbage soup, and potatoes, why can't they afford to eat better (richer, as it were)?

(My English friend can only eat prawns if he hunts for them himself, otherwise, he eats fried lettuce, and hamburgers.)

2007-11-07 02:59:42 · 15 answers · asked by xenypoo 7

So that conservatives and a few liberals can live in peace and harmony?

2007-11-07 02:44:50 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

With Mass Programs and the Loss of Individualism? And Big Government Control?

2007-11-07 02:43:05 · 32 answers · asked by Moody Red 6

2007-11-07 02:42:38 · 17 answers · asked by realitycheck 3

2007-11-07 02:35:32 · 13 answers · asked by realitycheck 3

The Religious Right, Moral Majority, whatever you want to call the movement, seems to be losing influence in American politics. Do you think this trend will continue?

2007-11-07 02:29:46 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Don't you think there's not much difference between conservatism and dictatorship?

2007-11-07 02:25:19 · 25 answers · asked by Razor 5

You'd be surprised !



These statistics are published by DOD and may be viewed at:

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf

2007-11-07 02:22:12 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Dennis Kucinich introduced HR 333 in the House articles of impeachment against Vice President Dick Cheney. He has 22 co-sponsors, and all the lies Cheney used to mislead Americans into the war in Iraq. So what's up with yahoo? Why doesn't it represent the news of our HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES?

2007-11-07 02:18:46 · 4 answers · asked by andy r 3

2007-11-07 02:12:52 · 9 answers · asked by BUSH/ISRAEL =warcriminal 5