After all, Chirac was right and Bush was wrong. Saddam DID comply, and there were NO weapons of mass destruction.
You'd hope Bush would be big enough to admit when he was wrong.
2007-11-07 03:22:58 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If Saddam DIDN'T comply...where are the WMD?
2007-11-07 03:29:21 · update #1
"of course there were WMD, they were moved."
Don't you Bush supporters know that believing in things without evidence is what got you in trouble in the first place?
2007-11-07 03:35:34 · update #2
Ritch, find me in that website where Chirac says he thinks Iraq has WMD. He does not.
2007-11-07 03:36:39 · update #3
Ritch:
When he says "may lead to think", he's not saying "I believe". They're called words. Read them.
2007-11-07 03:58:15 · update #4
No one should apologise to France...... ever
2007-11-07 03:26:49 · answer #1 · answered by sammael_coh 4 · 4⤊ 4⤋
No, because apparently the French and even Chirac, felt the same way.
And what you say is wrong. The French did not believe, as you imply, that Saddam had no WMD program. In fact, their intelligence services were one of the many that provided information supporting the belief that he did. For your education, I've provided a link below. You won't have to read much. His beliefs, which coincide with the presidents are in the second paragraph.
Seriously dude, seek knowledge. Knowledge is your friend. Ignorance is not.
Heavy sigh...
"Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that, over the past four years, in the absence of international inspectors, this country has continued armament programs."
Did you read the article or simply take issue with it? This is no different than what the president said in the lead up to the Iraq war.
You can't win on this one Moonbeam. You've asked an unsubstatiated question that cannot be supported by your twisted and erroneous thinking and 'facts'.
You're grasping at straws, my friend...or would 'splitting hairs' be more appropriate in your case. Regardless, my point completely refutes your question. Since Chirac 'thought' as Bush believed, no apology on the part of the President is necessary. I think, perhaps, you might want to go back and do a little research into what France's real objections were. They had nothing to do with the presence or absence of WMD's. But good try. All you lack is knowledge and that can be remedied...if you seek it.
2007-11-07 03:32:25 · answer #2 · answered by The emperor has no clothes 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Of course, he should. Bush, at best, has never been anything better than rude and uncouth. But offending someone is hardly the worst thing he has done since usurping the White House in 2000. He has gutted aid for the most vulnerable in our society and he has blocked every single bill that offered even the most minimal hope for economic and social justice. If the French need an apology, they are just going to have to get in line behind every single citizen of the U.S. because Bush has harmed this nation in a way from which it may very well never recover.
2007-11-07 04:13:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Once again, you have things ************. Chirac and his government conspired with Hussein to get under-the-table oil credits. You seem to have forgotten that already. He also tried to undermine the US's effort at the UN to keep a UN sanctioned effort from taking over in Iraq.
Hussein did have and did use WMDs. The coalition got rid of the three worst WMDs: Hussein and his two sons.
If you don't like Mr. Bush, that's too bad. But making libelous statements will not win you any followers.
2007-11-07 03:30:59 · answer #4 · answered by regerugged 7 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Diggin up old bones aren't you? APologize to France. What a stupid idea. Of course there were wmds. They were moved. Keep up or take notes.
2007-11-07 03:32:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
If Saddam DID comply, why were there 14 UN resolutions against Iraq?
2007-11-07 03:27:23 · answer #6 · answered by Pythagoras 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Sarkozy was bought and paid for by the US years ago. He would not want an apology from his puppet master!!!!
2007-11-07 03:36:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I was actually going to answer this seriously until I noticed who asked the question. Then I realized that a real answer would not help anyway, so thanks for the 2 points.
2007-11-07 03:31:42 · answer #8 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
D.C. Tombstane is WRONG
Sarkozy has already said THE INVASION OF IRAQ WAS WRONG
problem is these Republicans all think they are
above the law and way above apologizing for their mistakes
2007-11-07 03:31:12 · answer #9 · answered by Deidre K 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
This country has no reason to aplogize for JOCK THE ROCK for any reason, just by the election of Sarkozy shows their appology to the world.
2007-11-07 03:27:38 · answer #10 · answered by rance42 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
I don't think so. Now,please pass the dutchie on the left hand side.
2007-11-07 03:27:34 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋