English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

With Mass Programs and the Loss of Individualism? And Big Government Control?

2007-11-07 02:43:05 · 32 answers · asked by Moody Red 6 in Politics & Government Politics

Well Jim, It looks to me like distribution of the wealth is a part and parcel of the Liberal candidates, as well as high taxes, socializing medicine, Amnesty for illegals among so many other things, it sure looks like it is on the way.......

2007-11-07 03:43:42 · update #1

Sahara: I don't spend time on the couch. I have been In the workforce probably since before you were born. I was active in college and and after in many community projects. I know my Congressman and state Senator.
I was active in the Democratic party until it went to far , and left many years ago for Conservatism.
We need a 2 party system and we need both to come back to the grass roots.
Peace..........

2007-11-07 03:51:18 · update #2

32 answers

Liberalism is more than just advocating redistribution of wealth, and growth in government. Liberalism demands a level of orthodoxy that is present in certain religions. Liberals advocate the promotion of sexual harassment laws, that seek to codify conduct between the sexes, these codes will be determined by the most neurotic of females and any deviation will be an offense that if given a chance liberals would deem jail-able. How about hate crime legislation? That elevates some of us (the protected classes, women, gays, racial minorities) above others(white or Jewish males) This negates the worth of the individual and makes us all members of groups. The same can be said of affirmative action, or quotas used in college admissions. This intrusion sought by the fascist left is typical of what liberals have in mind for all of us. A patronizing view that all of us are too stupid to manage our own lives, and only with the help of a strick code of conduct, enforced by the elites can we have a fair(not free) society. Yes fascism always comes from the left

2007-11-07 05:46:12 · answer #1 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 3 0

Let's look at the facts, shall we..
They believe the "little people "are not smart enough to make decisions in their own lives.
The belief that they need to control every aspect of your life.
from the food that you eat, to what social programs your taxes
should go to. But without control, they simply increase the
tax burden every year without regard, in such , the average in the middle class families income is unable to keep up.
etc.. etc..
And it's all done in the name of " But we are for the people for the people". SOME OF YOU BELIEVE THIS.

The Democratic Liberal National Co. has become out of
touch with the honest, hardworking American family of today.

I too am a former , I'm ashamed to admit, Dem.
Who just came to realize that our party block was being run
over by "the limousine liberal crowd". And we regular Dem's
no longer mattered.

The only reason they care about "Illegals" is because it will
assure them an uneducated, blind, uninformed, vote without question, every year, voters block.

"FOR THE PEOPLE!" Wake up AMERICA. Let's do something while there is still a place to save, a place we could still call home, a place where it's stll safe for your children to play outside. Without the constant fear that many
parents have to live with in these big cities of today. If they can take their eyes off a child for one second , before one
of these neighborhood wack jobs, takes off with their babies.

God Help Us, and Bless You all.........

2007-11-07 07:18:14 · answer #2 · answered by "MAIKOO".... 3 · 2 0

In its current form I would say there is a legitimate argument to concur with that statement. Forcing people into government dependency is one step that is for sure. Another step is squashing debate through character assassination and control of the media. I am not saying it will end up a dictatorship but the steps are being followed that are historically taken enroute to dictatorship.

2007-11-07 03:39:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

you're incorrect on maximum of your factors, yet i'm going to forgive you at this element because evidently as in case you're a liberal. Totalitarianism ability that the controlling team needs everybody to be "one" or greater in similarity to the progressives who want everybody on the comparable point economically and mentally. noun a million. the practices and concepts of a totalitarian regime. 2. absolute administration via the state or a governing branch of a quite centralized enterprise. 3. the character or high quality of an autocratic or authoritarian individual, team, or government: the totalitarianism of the father. i might say that this sounds lots greater like what the left is attempting to do to the rustic, take finished administration of the persons. after all, conservatives prefer to offer greater capability back to the folk or persons, homosexuals are regarded as persons only no longer provided specific "rights" under the rule of thumb of regulation, birth control isn't being threatened with the aid of fact abortion grew to become into in no way meant to be a variety of start administration, and a great number of minorities are surely conservative in spite of in the event that they do no longer vote in that way and likewise welcomed in maximum conservative circles. you notice forcing everybody into the comparable cookie mildew IS totalitarianism, no longer attempting to guard individual rights and freedoms from governmental take over.

2016-12-08 14:45:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Let's see...

Wealth Distribution
Raising Taxes
Amnesty for Illegals
Various Pork Barrel Projects
Socialized Medicine
Death to fetuses
Gay Marriage
Sex Education for 5 yr olds
Birth Control for 10 yr olds

Not a dictatorship... It's "Social Progressive"

2007-11-07 02:53:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 10 3

Liberalism is not a form of dictatorship nor is conservatism. What we see in this country are classic examples of fanaticism which is always wrong, always leads to problems and almost always leads to censorship and, by extension, a form of dictatorship.

We really need to stop fighting their [the individual politicians] battles for personal and political leverage, not get sucked into the their prepubescent angst and think about what is best for this country. No one is purely liberal or purely conservative. We're all moderates at the end of the day and it's high time we stopped chasing the bogeyman and saw the forest through the trees.

Three thumbs down? Wow, you people really think that bickering amongst yourselves and villifying a whole group for their system of belief (when they only want the same things that you do: a better life for themselves and their children) is productive and will pull us back from the ledge that we're standing on with our toes dangling off the side? Geesh. Summer '08 can't get here fast enough because I'm so glad I'm out of here. You people are idiots who don't want to be saved.

2007-11-07 02:53:12 · answer #6 · answered by rachel m 4 · 4 6

It in many cases seems like it especially since they are the ones running around supporting dictators like Castro, Chavez, Kim, etc.

2007-11-07 05:54:29 · answer #7 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 2 0

The more we keep the government out of our lives the better life is.

Big government is a vicious circle of more and more taxes with less and less choice's

2007-11-07 03:04:07 · answer #8 · answered by Johnny 7 · 7 0

Yes, by using the liberal, massive programs, loss of iIndividual freedoms and Big Government philosophies of those in The PNAC and President Bush.
They however are not true liberals, just as they are not conservatives.

2007-11-07 02:56:54 · answer #9 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 3 2

N O, it is a form of socialist ideas, take from the
rich and give to the poor. Only thing is that if you make over $80,000 a year, then you are rich, according to Liberalism!!

2007-11-07 03:08:51 · answer #10 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 7 2

fedest.com, questions and answers