English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 24 June 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

2007-06-24 16:20:28 · 17 answers · asked by ænima 4

2007-06-24 16:10:13 · 37 answers · asked by Anonymous

Because to be human and be against this is like being a pig actively against the abolition of bacon?
What do you think?

2007-06-24 16:00:57 · 18 answers · asked by K. Marx iii 5

Lacey Peterson
Jesse Marie Davis

I'm sure these names sound familiar. Anyone who wasn't living on the moon knew about these women who were murdered, while still carrying their unborn, holding the last two years of top news headlines.

The Peterson case set a new law precedent. The persons responsible can and will be charged with TWO counts of murder, for the lives of the mother and the life within her.

What's the point of charging men with two counts of murder when some women get away with murdering their unborn everyday?

2007-06-24 15:54:43 · 28 answers · asked by Karma 6

The year that the New World Order is set to take over?

2007-06-24 15:47:14 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-24 15:44:02 · 14 answers · asked by ♥ Mel 7

I asked a question regarding voting for Hillary. and everyone is Anti-Hillary. I was just wondering who supports her and if you can explain why i'd appreciate it.
I don't understand much about politics and I'd like to know what she is all about..

2007-06-24 15:34:52 · 12 answers · asked by Mimi 4

I happen to think it might help to an extent, but war and violence seems to be mankind's nature. What do you think?

2007-06-24 15:31:13 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

The evil monkey in the White House wasn't content to alienate just the left and the center with his Iraq invasion. Now he's alientated the right with his shamnesty bill - just give us amnesty and in exchange we'll finally give you border security - the 1986 big lie all over again.

When you go to the RNC website, there's a photo of the monkey shaking hands with an adoring crowd. This idiot is like a millstone around the Republican Party's chances of electoral victory in '08. When will the Reps wise up and dump the monkey?

2007-06-24 15:24:41 · 7 answers · asked by kscottmccormick 6

2007-06-24 15:19:02 · 8 answers · asked by kionne 1

They make fun of The Dubya' who is a great leader, he is just a bad speeker. They make fun all republicans, and I wonder........ why!!! We are just traditional people. And the war on tearor was a needed move against tearorism. I know you are entitled to your opinion...... but why do you make fun of us!!!! You don't see conservative media rosting anyone.

2007-06-24 15:14:21 · 15 answers · asked by (o_o) 4

What do you think of this pair? That's a team i'd vote for in a heart beat.

2007-06-24 15:09:32 · 12 answers · asked by billy d 5

2007-06-24 15:08:24 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

He has enough important issues to focus on. How about just letting the president perform at his best for the remainder of the term? Public polls and online postings are meaningless distractions.

2007-06-24 15:04:24 · 31 answers · asked by Lionwarlord 1

attack us? It is too bad that the Republican controlled Congress tied CLintons hands about Bin Laden in the mid 90's when Sudan offered him to us. Its too bad they said Bin Laden wasn't our problem and hadn't done anything. Why didnt the Republicans care about keeping Americans safe? Why did they have to focus on a ******* instead of keeping us safe?

2007-06-24 15:03:19 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

I just asked a question on abortion and all I'm getting is "its legal from a few libs". Where is your superior reasoning?

2007-06-24 15:02:50 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

If a woman wants to kill herself, so be it. But in an abortion she will be killing something foreign to her body. You conviently call it a fetus but it's still a human.
I've known three women who have had abortions and the experience fractured them to the core. It not only kills the child but destroys the woman. I will never understand any of this. And yet, the same people decry the loss of human life in the war.

2007-06-24 14:51:58 · 40 answers · asked by Anonymous

George Bush used the term “rape rooms” when describing the atrocities of the Saddam Hussein regime. But did you know that during the Abu Ghraib torture investigation, General Taguba of the US Armed Forces investigation comity discovered footage of female Iraqi detainees being sodomized by American military guards? We viewed the photos of the humiliation the male detainees suffered; they endured physiological abuse, sexual humiliation, forced stress positions, etc. But how many of us knew while that was going on, their wives, daughters, and sisters, were being raped?

It is one thing to do this to their men, but when their women and girls are gathered up and systematically raped, we become no better then the men we overthrew in the first place. Our president used the terminology of sexual abuse as a method to shock and manipulate the American people to believe our invasion of Iraq was justified; yet we enter the scene and become guilty of the same behavior the Iraqis perpetrated.

2007-06-24 14:49:52 · 15 answers · asked by stupidity_of_pride 4

from Illinois, do you think he'd be in the top tier of the Democratic candidates now? How much do you think his race has to do with his position?

2007-06-24 14:48:32 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-24 14:42:41 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

With all the politicians saying they will do this and end up doing the opposite, who votes these days? It seems political parties have changed. Republicans, Democrats, Independ, etc aren't anything close to the descriptions in PolSci or Gov't class. The media doesn't help make voting easier.

2007-06-24 14:38:30 · 20 answers · asked by OPP101 2

Is he backed up by the 9/11 commission report? Is the 9/11 commission report not God's word for George supporters who believe that 9/11 was a terrorist attack perpetrated by 19 Saudi hijackers?

2007-06-24 14:38:11 · 15 answers · asked by Open your eyes 4

using agressive foriegn policy, trade agreeements, and weapon antiproliferation politics, would we all be speaking German today??

2007-06-24 14:23:13 · 17 answers · asked by Boss H 7

2007-06-24 14:22:43 · 11 answers · asked by Jeremy P 2

From what I read, Andrew Jackson has been judged by historians to be the worst. I have no knowledge of why they say that.

But more recently, Jimmy Carter, while president accomplished the goals of making double digit inflation, having us wait for gasoline that cost, adjusted for inflation, what it did this spring (we broke the record), had extremely high interest rates which discouraged home ownership, and had a stagnant economy with high unemployment. Lets not forget about his buying of hostages telling the world the US WILL negotiate with you.

I don't agree with alot of what Bush has done, especially the Patriot Act and his spending tendencies. But he is far from the worst.

Not to mention currently Jimmy Carter is certifying elections in Venezuela and calls Bush the worst president. A man who lives in a glass house shouldn't cast stones.

2007-06-24 14:19:48 · 18 answers · asked by Scott L 4

How can they benefit me? I have voted a straight Democrat ticket for years.

2007-06-24 14:18:19 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

As the strongest supporter of the Constitution:
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.
He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.

2007-06-24 13:57:42 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers