Who else thinks that Ron Paul would not protect our country from another terrorist attack?

Question

lol at dj He thinks I am a little girl

Answer 1

Of course he wouldn't protect us from terrorists. That's the reason the conspiracy theorist nuts support him.

Answer 2

I don't think Ron Paul or anyone else is going to be able to guarantee the USA will not be hit by another Terrorist attack.. Actually i feel the Only true defense the U.S.A has is its Peoples,..and their patriotism and Their conscientious reporting of Suspicious Activity.. to the Appropriate Authorities,.One Thing that I'm sure of.. The different Agencies that Investigate Suspicious Groups or Individuals have Thwarted many would be Attacks already. I feel the Maniacs that call themselves "Jihadists"...are and have moved within and Amongst the American Populace. What can be done?...be a good stewards of Your Country and report suspicious Activity ..wherever you are aware of it..The Defense of America does not settle only on the shoulders of Our Troops...we must do our part as well.

Answer 3

That is the stupidest thing I ever heard. Ron Paul supports a strong defence. The only reason we are a favourite target of terrorists is that we have spread our resources way too thin by attempting to occupy countries all over the world, and manage their internal affairs at the expense of our own.

It is this same foreign policy that creates terrorists by getting people killed all over the world and thereby enraging their country men and family members.

Finally, a well armed citizenry would prevent any terrorist from hijacking a plane, or getting more than a couple shots out in a shooting rampage.

One thing is for sure: Bush sure hasn't protected us from terrorists. Remember 911?

Answer 4

I think you have it turned around Vegas. The question should be who is going to protect Ron Paul from Dead Eye Dick Chaney?

Ron Paul will probably bring back the Militia, and training for the militia and proper care of guns would be taught at an early age.

You want to be FREE you've got to learn how to protect your freedom yourself. Responsibility is everybodys job.

Answer 5

I think he'd do better than GWBush has done. Al Qaeda and muslim terrorists haven't attacked us since 9/11 but Mexican gangs/terrorists, notably los Zetas, have killed many Americans in the Southwest United States. And even though Al Q hasn't attacked us, they have attacked our NATO allies. So what good are we as "policemen" ?

GWB promised us that Osama and Al Qaeda would be brought to justice but instead he used our military and our resources to go after Saddam who was NOT a bigger immediate threat than Al Qaeda or Osama.

Being stubborn and foolish will only get the troops you seek to support killed as well as more innocent civilian Americans.

I don't know if Ron Paul is the answer but I do know that another GOP christian conservative like George Bush, IS NOT and another politics-as-usual liberal democrat like Hillary Clinton is NOT.

It is time for regular, normal Americans to step up and take our nation back from these corrupt, extremist cons and libs and their willfully ignorant supporters.

Answer 6

That's a pretty big assumption from a person who supports George Bush. Remember 9/11? And where was George again whilst all of this was happening? He wouldn't happen to have been protecting the country by any chance would he?

Answer 7

How many Marshals you see on boats that can easily cruise into our harbors packed with explosives?
how many of those harbors were almost owned by arabs?

How many marshals were on airlines before september 11th, even though they knew that there was going to be airplane hijackings? the rest of the world was getting ready for it, why didn't we? because the airline industry's lobby claimed that more security measures would be too expensive.

Answer 8

There is only one foreign policy that the insane jihadists care about. Will we help defend Israel from destruction? A Secretary of State cannot defend against that type of mentality.

Answer 9

He would do it. It was Bush who didn't protect us from a terrorist attack it was on his watch remember? Don't blame Clinton either, he wasn't President and Bush WAS warned about Bin Laden.

Answer 10

Ron Paul would protect us from whatever terrorists are out there by having a smart foreign policy. But he would let us be free also. He would do it all without taking away our civil liberties. And he would start a war against another country, not on an IDEA. WE HAVE ENOUGH WARS ON IDEAS!


And he would put a stop to all of the vulnerabilities that BUSH LEAVES IN PLACE, like an OPEN BORDER!

Edit: Right -how can you day that bush has done so well, when 9/11 happened on his watch?

Why are you so scared of terrorists, anyways? Are you a wuss, like a liberal? Are you a chicken? (i think you get my point)

Answer 11

Congress would have to actually have to declare war. the man would not be afraid to kick a little *** in defense of the United States of America. I like the man.