Politics - 11 June 2007

at a high risk of death or the child a product of forceable rape, that the mother then is imeaditly setrilized, so that she can no longer opt to abort? Many women have had multiple abortions, that is a fact! Isnt a woman who keeps having abortions a mass murderer? Even hear of a baby chosing to die?

2007-06-11 03:36:47 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-11 03:22:20 · 7 answers · asked by Brotherhood 7

its just an observation. Isnt this the type of government that he objects?

2007-06-11 03:21:11 · 13 answers · asked by Steven Colbert 4

He lied to just about everyone in the country, including his family, he cheated on his wife, then was too much of a coward to stand up to the terrorists that attacked us several times during his administration. should such a person even be classified as a human being?

2007-06-11 03:21:01 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

I was leaning towards Hilary, but it seems John Edwards and his terrorism as a 'bumper sticker' remarks makes him the clear front-runner in either appeasing terrorists or running from them.

2007-06-11 03:17:32 · 17 answers · asked by Frank Dileo 3

My Daughter was born 6 weeks early. The first two weeks of her life. She had tubes in both arms and in her stomach. At birth, the doctors only give her a 30% chance to make it. And claimed that she could've given up at any time.

I would visit her in the evenings. Just putting my hand in her crib. She'd grab ahold of me for dear life. She had many reasons to quit. But had only life, as a reason to live. Exactly 12-Hours BEFORE they were to remove her tubes. She pulled them out, herself!!

She turns 30, next month. She's healthy and has two children of her own.

Yeah! You can say I'm Pro-Life.
I have proof of what a newborn wants.
And what a Life deserves

QUESTION:
Stories, like this, go on everyday.
Would this make someone change their opinion about Abortion?

**And I remind you, this is Yahoo Answers. Not Yahoo Insults**

2007-06-11 03:15:42 · 26 answers · asked by Nunya Bidniss 7

It appears we are NOT to be given the promised referendum on the new EU Constitution.

Tony is expected to sign up to it next week.

We are being sold down the river yet again.

Any reasonable comments will be gratefully accepted.

2007-06-11 03:04:31 · 16 answers · asked by CurlyQ 4

Democrats and Republicans both.
As a Republican I am really angry that my senators voted for this.

2007-06-11 02:54:26 · 10 answers · asked by inzaratha 6

2007-06-11 02:49:53 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is it because Democrats are generally weak on defense?

http://edition.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/06/07/lawmaker.scuffle.ap/

2007-06-11 02:46:37 · 15 answers · asked by Frank Dileo 3

2007-06-11 02:45:40 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Bush has done nothing but defend this country against enemies that hate freedom. He liberated Iraq. There may be problems now, but this is a long term project. It takes sacrifice.

It seems like everywhere you turn, you see some new allegation of so-called corruption. It's a witch hunt.

Why all the hate?

2007-06-11 02:42:23 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

and don't say nothing~

2007-06-11 02:39:17 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

It is possible to be wealthy and pay zero dollars in income tax in this country. An unemployed wealthy person with no investment or interest income would pay nothing in income tax.
The current progressive income tax structure taxes only working people, rich or middle-class, and burdens those who can afford it the least.
The current system also ignores people who are amassing fortunes thru illegal activity like major drug dealers.
Shouldn't we consider a tax structure based on wealth rather than income?
I am not proposing taxing the rich to death. There are, however, people who control fortunes and not paying a fair share of taxes.

2007-06-11 02:19:45 · 7 answers · asked by Perplexed Bob 5

2007-06-11 02:17:22 · 8 answers · asked by Fr. Al 6

2007-06-11 01:39:19 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

I would send the Army to our southern border and seal it. I'd then let all governments know that this is our right to do and I would not brook any complaints.

2007-06-11 01:20:51 · 16 answers · asked by PARVFAN 7

Call the police? Send them to boarding school? Ground them for life?

2007-06-11 01:14:41 · 27 answers · asked by Frank 2

He knows the vast majority of the American people are opposed to this bill. Isnt this something a liberal democrat would do and not a conservative? Can my friends on Yahoo answers please tell me what his motive is? Or is it that he has got to the age where he has the same affliction his father had? He just dont get it?

2007-06-11 01:13:07 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean if he's so welcome there? Shouldn't they elect him President, so he can bring big oil, wars, and stupidity to them?

2007-06-11 00:44:06 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-11 00:39:08 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous

Yeah, see, that's the diference between George Bush and Bill Clinton. The American people loved Clinton. Bush's handlers have to take the globe's temperature, so to speak, and find some anti-democracy backwater that is so poor that they are THRILLED to have U.S. attention, and the implied promise of U.S. aid on the way.

The forward looking, socially progressive liberal American majority will stick with Bill, thanks. America didn't need foreign pity or foreign aid while he was president, although friends, we had plenty then. America has to go digging for it's friends now.

--Peace--

2007-06-11 00:22:17 · 8 answers · asked by Dr. Tyree Love 2