Which Democrat Presidential candidate would be more effective in appeasing terrorists?

Question

I was leaning towards Hilary, but it seems John Edwards and his terrorism as a 'bumper sticker' remarks makes him the clear front-runner in either appeasing terrorists or running from them.

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N23249777.htm

Answer 1

Definitely John Edwards . He made the 'bumper sticker' comment and then his poll ratings dropped 8% in a matter of 2 or 3 weeks . He's barely hovering around 10% support from Dems and low single digits when you add Reps to the poll .

Then the genius(sarcasm) decides to buddy-up with Danny "I love Chavez' Glover . Stupid stupid stupid . Who's advising this guy anyway ?

Answer 2

I believe all the candidates want to continue fighting terrorism and Al Qaeda in their real base, Afghanistan. I too am worried that many candidates want the United States to abandon Iraq... but I wouldn't call them appeasers. Richardson called for a full withdrawal from Iraq... if that's what you're concerned about. Clinton and Edwards, on the other hand, continue to support the war in Iraq in one form or another

Answer 3

That is race to the bottom I don't want to think about.

Right now the democrats are appealing to the far left to get the nomination.

However, when they real election hits they are going to have to come back to center.

I thought the DNC would have learn from how they dumb on Lieberman but I was wrong.

Right now if I was to pick one I would go with Obama the one who said "Those who die are wasted"

Answer 4

Hi, did you know the word is "Democratic"? "Democrat politician" is just McCarthyistic goading and childish baiting, you should avoid it if you want to be taken seriously. And why would you want to appease terrorists? That isn't very bright. None of the Democratic candidates want to do that, I don't see why you would even think its a good idea. Oh well, thats Republicans for ya!

Did you see on the news where the Chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party said there should be several more 9-11 attacks so the Republicans could win. Boy is that patriotic. At least for you Republicans.

Answer 5

Senator Obama in no way "pledge" to apply public financing. all the familiar applicants spoke back to a survey in 2007. In that survey it grew to become into asked "might you make the main of public financing rather of public money in the favourite election". Senator Obama's reaction grew to become into that he might evaluate it and communicate it with the repubican candidate. He basically pledge to chat to no longer bind himself to public financing. in reality, think of approximately it for a minute. Its 2007, you're in the primaries - might you commit your self to something in basic terms in case you grow to be the nominee. of direction no longer, you do no longer understand what's going to take place in 2008 so why might everybody "pledge" something at that factor; it extremely is in basic terms user-friendly experience to maintain all your techniques open. even regardless of the undeniable fact that, Obama can develop $4.00 for each $a million.00 that McCain can develop - McCain is totally conscious that he would be out-funded. He knows he won't be able to save up and that the Obama marketing campaign will placed money into classified ads, categorized classified ads and rally's everywhere in the rustic. McCain won't have the money to maintain up with that form of marketing campaign. i might ask this question - is it that Obama is working a similar form of politics or are you listening to a similar form of smear approaches that the republicans have been utilizing for the previous 15 years? basically a sort of issues that make you pass - hummmmmmmmm.

Answer 6

Dems are great at appeasement.
Why on god's earth do you want to "appease" terrorists?

I mean, shoot, we can just set them up in nice appartments and let them run the country and they'd be mighty appeased.

Please tell me you are kidding.

Answer 7

actually if we can vote in the Bush follower Guliani we will have a better chance at appeasment. Since he will change nothing that Bush did which will keep the funding for the terrorists in tact we should be ok. Nice stupid question, have anything intelligent to say?

Answer 8

George W. Bush

He IS the only President who deserted his post in a time of War, if that isn't running from the enemy I'm not sure what is

Answer 9

Hands down, Barack Obama. The man is a wolf in sheeps clothing and will literally give away the store to the islamo-facists.

Answer 10

Which one sent Pellosi to kiss the ....... of terrorist leaders and wear a headscarf? Hillary.