Politics - 8 November 2006

2006-11-08 12:43:40 · 14 answers · asked by Dastardly 6

when he fights for our country in that coliseum of world dictators and criminals otherwise known as the UN?

Does it disturb your sensibilities that he places America's interests above all others?

Would you rather our UN Ambassador bow to world "leaders" that deny the existence of terrorism?

2006-11-08 12:41:06 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-08 12:40:46 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Quack Quack!

2006-11-08 12:31:16 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-08 12:30:20 · 40 answers · asked by Dastardly 6

Having dug himself into a hole that he can't ge out of, having admitted that he made a mistake in Iraq and fired Rumsfield, he will be glad to place the blame on someone else when things go wrong.

2006-11-08 12:29:22 · 14 answers · asked by October 7

2006-11-08 12:26:19 · 12 answers · asked by eldoradoman1953 2

I just read about some Black Woman Democrat who doesn't vote---WHY ON EARTH WOULD A PERSON NOT VOTE???

That means you are responsible for Bush being in office, troops being killed, tough setencing laws for black prisoners, etc.

2006-11-08 12:25:35 · 8 answers · asked by Victory 3

2006-11-08 12:21:31 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Enron is out....

2006-11-08 12:17:10 · 3 answers · asked by Bad M 4

This is a question for the illegal immigration advocates who use the obnoxious rhetoric "nobody is an illegal" to support their radical views on border security, or lack thereof. Explain how that statement is true. If nobody is considered "illegal," there are no laws. This position, whether inadvertently or not, represents an anarchist point of view. The fact is, some people ARE "illegal," but we must decide what should and should not be considered, "illegal." However, if we can't agree that some people should be considered illegal, or guilty of doing illegal things, then it is impossible to engage in political debate. And since it is those - not all, but some - on the Left who are advocating this position, that nobody is illegal, aren't they the ones who are wrong since this is in fact a society of laws and regulations whether they like it or not?

Convince me otherwise.

2006-11-08 12:16:27 · 5 answers · asked by Leroy Johnson 5

http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player06.html?110306/110306_of_richards&OReilly_Factor&Pro-Choice%20Advocate&acc&US&324&News&329&&&new

2006-11-08 12:08:00 · 8 answers · asked by Ford Prefect 7

Since we invaded Iraq and tore the country apart and going to use our taxpayer dollars to rebuild it costing billions when all is said and done. Do we all own a piece of Iraq? The biggest portion of money being spent there is USA dollars so that seems to be right or has that been the plan all along? I'd like some free oil please

2006-11-08 12:04:54 · 9 answers · asked by katlady927 6

I didn't notice the little swing he has as he walked, and he seemed very willing to make friends with Democrats.

Do you think he means it, or he just knows Nancy Pelosi is not leaving any stones unturned in her upcoming investigations?

Recall that Nancy asked for the resignation of Rumsfeld...

2006-11-08 12:04:15 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

i'd say he's a murderer

2006-11-08 11:56:34 · 8 answers · asked by hugh c 2

..Yet when Democrats lose they moan, cry and yell THEY STOLE IT FROM US for years on end? Are Republicans just basicaly classier?

2006-11-08 11:53:29 · 19 answers · asked by BAARAAACK 5

The FBI has further delayed the release of a video that they promised to us on NOV 9 and that may show the impact of flight 77 into the Pentagon on September 11th 2001.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AvOUmkc.ejBhUlbGXaJXJbjsy6IX?qid=20061104173532AAX8K3J

Judicial Watch said-
'The Government said they needed more time'. When asked when enough time would pass before they could release the tape, they said they didn't know and it was indefinite...

Ongoing FOIA requests and subsequent lawsuits should now have forced all known video tapes of the Pentagon attack out into the open. It seems that abiding by judicial law is something that the FBI refuses to be a part of however.What are they cooking up? If they are not cooking anything up why are they flouting the law by refusing to release this and the other 83 tapes?

2006-11-08 11:47:43 · 8 answers · asked by big-brother 3

When the job is done is my answer, nothings changed.Democrats told ya all what you wanted to hear to get your votes.The war will win when Iraq can fend off the insurgents and not before!

2006-11-08 11:47:34 · 6 answers · asked by BAARAAACK 5

Okay I stated in a abortion debate...."I'm pro-life but I don't believe because I disagree with it, it should be illegal."
Then some guy said, "coup out.
Abortion - you either think that thing in the mother's womb is a person or just cells. It's black and white right there. If you think it's a person, you wouldn't have an abortion. You wouldn't allow others to kill a person, why would you give other people the "choice" here? Which means - you're trying to avoid controversy and seem like a good person, but you're for abortion. You can't be against abortion, but also for choice. That's like saying I'm against murdering others unjustly, I wouldn't do it, but I'm all for the choice others have to do it.


"Oh but..." then you then you think that thing in the womb is just cells. You're pro-abortion. Just admit it.

Don't waste your time on talking politics if you don't know what you're talking about."

What is a good rebuttal to his statement?

2006-11-08 11:45:50 · 10 answers · asked by AnnaDuff 1

It seems that Bush only says this to people who are extremely incompetent.

2006-11-08 11:45:34 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-08 11:41:12 · 9 answers · asked by eldoradoman1953 2

It seems that every time he has said this to someone, the person turns out to be very incompetent. What does Bush really mean?

2006-11-08 11:38:15 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

When I was younger, I never cared about politics. Once in a while, the school teacher would bring the topic up and I'll zone out what s/he said. However, now, I follow politics closely. In fact, I find the big elections to be really interesting. Is it because the battle between the Democrats and Republicans has intesified over the past couple of years or is it just me?

2006-11-08 11:37:12 · 2 answers · asked by Mr. Main Event 5

2006-11-08 11:32:23 · 10 answers · asked by butterfly49653 1

Bush is not to blame he has kept us from getting bombed over here, he has done so much for our country, how do you think you are able to enjoy the freedoms you have right now? And wasn't most of America for the war after 911? yes they were and if he didn't go over there everyone would have been upset over that. weather you are for him or not we all need to respect him as our leader and uphold our troops and stand behind them, how do you think they feel hearing all of this! so come on people lets be true Americans and start showing and acting like, we can't stand if we are divided!

2006-11-08 11:31:38 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

is it just views on issues, do they want the country to be run differently, how do they effect the presidency?

2006-11-08 11:30:23 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

There's no doubt about it, to see Neo-Cons who have been strutting around like John Wayne for the past five years finally eat humble pie is a breath of fresh air, but let's not be so deluded.....

Will the Military Commissions Act, a bill that effectively nullifies nine of the ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution be repealed under a Democrat House and Senate? Highly unlikely. Will the surveillance cameras that have invaded American streets via Homeland Security be curtailed under the Democrats? If anything Big Brother will only get bigger.

Pelosi voted for the war in Afghanistan, the Patriot Act, for Homeland Security and against a bill that condemned torture of prisoners in Iraq. Her record on immigration is horrible and Gun Owners of America scored her an F minus.

What we can look forward to are the same policies of big government, crackdown on dissent, destruction of sovereignty and occupation of sovereign nations all in the name of the new boss....same as the old boss?

2006-11-08 11:22:56 · 5 answers · asked by big-brother 3

needs to take in order to effectively address terrorism and end the war in Iraq?

2006-11-08 11:21:28 · 1 answers · asked by lil_flirt_57<3 2

Just a few years ago noone ever even dared mention the word "Marijuana" in or around the whitehouse, now I hear it almost every week. I have a very very good feeling it will finally be legalized for medicinal use, but what about recreational. Does anyone even have a plan written up on how they would enact it and/or what the new laws would look like?

2006-11-08 11:20:44 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-08 11:18:43 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous