2006-11-08 12:43:40 · 14 answers · asked by Dastardly 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No I am not. I think she is one smart and logical lady to have done so, it is not the fact that there is nothing impeachable anyone with a brain knows that probably a lot that could be called impeachable but the alternative to Bush is Cheney and the lesser of the two evils is Bush.
2006-11-08 13:11:30 · answer #1 · answered by billc4u 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
properly, the conspiracy theorists have quite lots run that complete impeachment factor into the floor so I won't answer via occurring the comparable properly trampled direction. What you could desire to comprehend is that Pelosi is calling forward to the 2008 Presidential Elections and he or she is familiar with that beginning impeachment courtroom circumstances now does no longer accomplish something, George W. Bush can't be re-elected to place of work and Dick Cheney has already suggested that he has no prefer to seek for the GOP nomination for 2008 elections. To waste the tax payers money and congresses time to hold impeachment courtroom circumstances that ought to in no way be upheld because of the fact they'd't get 2/3 of the vote to prevail would placed a bad flavor interior the mouths of Republicans, Democrats and Independents alike. no one desires to work out their elected officers waste their time and components and our money for partisan politics which will accomplish no longer something. as far because of the fact the "complete Amnesty" factor, wager what, virtually each incoming President has issued an entire amnesty to each outgoing President! particular, that incorporates William Jefferson Clinton receiving an entire amnesty from George W. Bush, and William Jefferson Clinton issued one for Bush Senior. this is accomplished as a count of keeping a former sitting President from criminal and civil action while they depart place of work and it somewhat is accomplished as a count of coverage in spite of notwithstanding if the outgoing President believes he's accomplished something to % amnesty or no longer.
2016-10-21 12:24:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not at all. I think she sees the responsibility in not wasting the hard earned money of the tax payers to prosecute on something that may very well backfire, as it has in recent attempts. It's better to let Bush mess it up even more for who comes after him GOP-wise, is their strategy, I believe.
2006-11-08 12:49:29 · answer #3 · answered by sjsosullivan 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
She said this before the elections. You weren't paying attention. And, no I am not upset.
Sound political strategy if the dems want a shot at the 2008 presidency.
2006-11-08 12:50:42 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He has to have committed a crime to be impeached, and I haven't heard anyone articulate the relevant portion of the U.S. Code yet.
2006-11-08 13:01:43 · answer #5 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That news must make you guys just crazy. Oh my god, this is gonna be funny. Now all you guys can go and foam at the mouth in the internet chat rooms and at the Daily Koz.
2006-11-08 13:25:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, I'm happy Pelosi is learning how to be a moderate.
2006-11-08 12:46:59 · answer #7 · answered by cynical 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Theres nothing he can be impeached for anyway!
2006-11-08 12:53:37 · answer #8 · answered by BAARAAACK 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hey, Bush will feed her next week. She wants to make sure he can't douse it with something before she takes office ;-)
2006-11-08 12:46:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes shes a py ssy wich im ready for. tired of those pricks in there now
2006-11-08 12:50:57 · answer #10 · answered by eldoradoman1953 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋