Politics - 30 October 2006

how will liberals protect America? protest signs? or surrendering?

Remember liberals do not like the right to bear arms and are too scared to fight for America

2006-10-30 13:12:29 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.lafn.org/politics/gvdc/Natl_Debt_Chart.html

http://www.uuforum.org/deficit.htm

2006-10-30 13:10:50 · 11 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1

Wouldn't the terrorists want to lay low to keep the Republicans in control?

2006-10-30 13:07:44 · 9 answers · asked by John 3

i want to know who acully like georeg w. bush cause i dont,and why do u like or dont like him funnest answer wins best answer.

2006-10-30 13:07:27 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

of battleship?

"you sank my battleship" boo hoo hoo

2006-10-30 13:06:57 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

on our national defense? is this what they mean by cut and run?

2006-10-30 13:04:52 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Lets analyze the data shall we?

3,000 people died because Bush failed to prevent the largest and most successful terrorist attack on our nation.

3,000 people died because Bush failed to attack the right country responsible for 9.11.

2,000 people died because Bush failed to protect Americans after Katrina had struck the Gulf states and creating a national crisis/tragedy.

Permitting hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens to invade America.

Even though Bush has spent billions more then Clinton in Defense, creating the Department of Homeland Security and running in 2000 and 2004 on a stronger defense why has Bush failed time and time again in protecting America? 8,000 Americans are now dead because of Bush!

2006-10-30 13:02:08 · 16 answers · asked by Liberated Truth 1

even after he already made billions, do you really think he will give us all a break?

2006-10-30 13:00:48 · 21 answers · asked by myentertainment.net 2

I really try not to get too caught up in the propaganda that's sometimes shown on the news or in the papers. However, I couldn't help but notice that the United States always seems to get a share of the blame, whenever something goes wrong in the world. When did "big brother" become a scape goat?

2006-10-30 12:58:12 · 13 answers · asked by LibraT 4

I made these up a few years ago:

D E M O C R A T S = Devil's Evil Minions Orchestrating Crazed Repulsive Acts Toward Society

R E P U B L I C A N S = Rational Empowered Patriots Upholding Basic Lessons In Civics And National Security

2006-10-30 12:57:50 · 9 answers · asked by zoomat4580 4

Is there something wrong with having the judiciary oversee the program (that is, through the use of warrants)? FISA allowed for wiretapping without warrants in emergencies where the warrant was obtained after the wiretap; what's wrong with that system?

2006-10-30 12:53:57 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-30 12:43:29 · 8 answers · asked by Perplexed 7

"is" can we expect them to know how to push an on screen button to vote?

I can hear it now yall cheated Diebold blah blah LMAO

2006-10-30 12:42:25 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-30 12:35:22 · 6 answers · asked by STUD MAGNET HEIDI 1

2006-10-30 12:32:49 · 8 answers · asked by STUD MAGNET HEIDI 1

All we do is help them, and they show no appreciation!

2006-10-30 12:23:06 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-30 12:19:53 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Religion:a set of beliefs passionately held

The opposite of religion would then be a neutral or maybe pragmatic postion with respect to any problem or issue. That is, your not sold to any particular belief system per se...you analyze things from a pragmatic or agnostic like view.

If you passionately believe in "egalitarianism" or "socialism" or "communism", your essentially no different that someone who 'believes' in Muhammadism or Judaism. You passionately believe in some belief system. If you think about it, the belief in God, is really a small detail.

For example, is a Communist zealot less passionate than a Jihadist for his righteous cause?

Consider the religious doctrines of the left, like 'egalitarianism'. Everything must be equal. Every breast an "A cup" and every income 50K. The religious pursuit of "egalitarianism" is the ultimate 'dog-chasing his tail' paradox. Every idiot has a different idea of what this means, which is ofcourse the classic problem of religion.

2006-10-30 12:12:46 · 12 answers · asked by Captain PC 1

I hear him talked about alot but would like to know from people who were around during his time.

2006-10-30 12:06:46 · 19 answers · asked by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5

But the majority of their leadership is ultra rich?

2006-10-30 12:06:33 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-30 12:03:33 · 18 answers · asked by billgersitz 1

im not talking of the wmds im talking about a huge cache of conventional weapons that we brought over there but somehow misplaced.........where could they be and who is responsible for them being gone?....

2006-10-30 11:57:02 · 8 answers · asked by Unfrozen Caveman 6

How old were you and who did you want to win and did that opinion change as you got older?

2006-10-30 11:56:30 · 10 answers · asked by Perplexed 7

Ok, so im a sophmore at Johns Hopkins University in baltimore, i.e. one of the major research and medical institutions in the entire world.

On saturday, the Sigma Chi fraternity posted on facebook (college myspace) an extremely racist party invite called "Halloween in the hood." In the invitation, the social chair of the party writes that baltimore is an "HIV pit" and refered to blacks as "scallywhops, hoodrats, and skig skags." Infront of the party house Sigma Chi hung a skeleton that was meant to resemble a black person.

The whole school right now is an uproar.
The NAACP of baltimore are also involved.

What do you guys think?

2006-10-30 11:56:05 · 10 answers · asked by khaoticwarchild 3

And what are their views on those issues?

2006-10-30 11:56:03 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm a Republican and I know I could never be a Democrat. I have to much common sense. I'm already disqualified from being a Democrat.

But would you ever switch parties?

2006-10-30 11:53:11 · 8 answers · asked by John 3

Given the fact that they jump to conclusions and make rash desisions.. would you really trust life on all of the planet to them?...

2006-10-30 11:52:55 · 5 answers · asked by david n 3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories

just read like the 1st 3 paragraphs...I mean for the government to know and not do anything.

2006-10-30 11:52:50 · 3 answers · asked by rutgersbanana 1

I tried in this question, and got broad links to things like "oreily sucks dot com"

Here, Let me hold your hand, andgive you an example of what specific means. Here are two stories, about the same thing.

The fox story tells you all the information, including the things that look bad for the bush administration, while the washington post concentrates only on the negative information toward the bush administration:

http://tinyurl.com/rxgu8

http://tinyurl.com/fkymn


Do you think you understand the question, now? Since you are all so quick to denounce fox news, give me a SPECIFIC EXAMPLE of why their reporting is bad, and compare it to another story.

if you can not, then that makes you a hypocrite.

2006-10-30 11:50:57 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

I have asked this one before, but I want to see if there are any more opinions out there.

I will leave it open for others to vote on the best answer.

2006-10-30 11:49:23 · 5 answers · asked by footynutguy 4