Politics - 10 October 2006

2006-10-10 13:01:57 · 2 answers · asked by Vickie C 1

PAUL O'NEILL (SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY) SAID THAT BUSH SAID WITHIN DAYS OF MOVING INTO THE WHITEHOUSE IN 2001 THAT "WE'RE GOING TO WAR WITH IRAQ, AND YOU GUYS ARE GOING TO FIGURE OUT A REASON FOR US TO GO OVER THERE!"

DO YOU THINK BUSH WOULD HAVE EVEN STOOD A CHANCE AGAINST AL GORE HAD HE MENTIONED THE QUAGMIRE HE HAD IN MIND?

2006-10-10 12:48:14 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-10 12:46:12 · 19 answers · asked by Villain 6

Either he did it or didn't prevent it from happening.
Why do so many of them believe that?

2006-10-10 12:43:11 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

Washington Post poll claiming Democrats taking the lead oversamples Democrats 11% and takes it on the weekend (where Dems are usually favored). New York Times polls people not even registered to vote. Is the media trying to keep republicans at home?

2006-10-10 12:36:31 · 19 answers · asked by MEL T 7

And what about those two 6 ton titanium allow rolls-royce engines on the boeing. certainly at 500 mph they would have been around somewhere, as well as the two holes they would have left at that speed. Its all in the pictures that are examined in "loose change". Video too. If the government only wanted us to have 1 video footage of the pentagon crash, why such a poor on, where there nothing to identify but a white blob? Surely there would be better footage from the hotel cameras?

2006-10-10 12:32:44 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

A) Make Excuses or Pretend it didn't happen
B) Blame Clinton
C) Dare him to do more tests
D) Wait for US city to be actually bombed
E) All of the above

2006-10-10 12:32:00 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Hands up all that are looking forward to the war crimes tribunal.

2006-10-10 12:31:03 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

If the world had a centralised government, where would the world leader come from?

2006-10-10 12:24:14 · 7 answers · asked by Janji 3

Its called "Loose Change" Everyone is invited to download a copy, just ask and I'll post a link. Theres no spyware or viruses or anything like that, just the film. If you believe you already know every possible thing there is to know about 9/11, then certainly you wouldn't mind watching this film. If you firmly believe that there is nothing that can sway your stance on what you saw on television that day, then you face no risk of "brainwashing" by this film. You won't be "drinking koolaid" by watching it. If you honestly take the gravity of the event in 2001 seriously and expect an explanation as to why many of your fellow Americans were killed and are willing to explore ALL POSSIBILITIES before deciding, then please, endure this one film for an hour or so. Just watch the first 30 minutes of it. Then come back here and answer this one question. Do you still feel the same about that day?

2006-10-10 12:20:58 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-10 12:17:33 · 11 answers · asked by Villain 6

Now he says that he still hasn't picked sides in the War on Terror. He doesn't know which side is right. I think he's a liar, after all, he's married to Hanoi Jane isn't he? He picked his side when he married that criminal. His side would be ANTI-AMERICAN! WADDA LOSER!!!!

2006-10-10 12:12:32 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/Hudna-X.gif

2006-10-10 12:11:07 · 7 answers · asked by julean33 2

The USA can't continue to borrow money to pay it's bills.

Like the War in Iraq. It's all BORROWED money. And the debt is left to burden future generations.

2006-10-10 12:09:15 · 7 answers · asked by Villain 6

I understand that he couldn´t have sent a nuclear facility anywhere so he probably didn´t have one of those but I´m wondering about all the chemical and bilogical weapons. After all he did use them against his own people, it´s a documented fact, and he wouldn´t let the inspectors in to see what he had leading up to the war so he must have been hiding something.

2006-10-10 12:08:50 · 8 answers · asked by Papachango 1

2006-10-10 12:02:58 · 10 answers · asked by Dane 6

Then why has our Government passed a law that legitimizes this

2006-10-10 11:59:47 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Just 6 weeks before Sept. 11th?

2006-10-10 11:54:02 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why was there only one piece of an engine found out of all of it, and why does this piece not match any part of the Boeing that hit it?

2006-10-10 11:49:20 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

8.5 TRILLION DOLLAR National Debt
250 Billion dollar a year deficit
Record number of personal bankruptcies
More debt per capita than any other nation
The most indebted nation in the history of Earth

A endless war in Iraq, another war on terrorism the USA won't win, unless serious changes are made. Both wars have ruined our nations credibility.

WHO SAID THE US EMPIRE WILL LAST FOREVER?
No empire has ever lasted.

2006-10-10 11:49:09 · 11 answers · asked by Villain 6

2006-10-10 11:45:29 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

.. has got anything to do with the running of America?

2006-10-10 11:41:22 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Reporter says magazine killed story in May,
2 newspapers had info from source 1 year ago
October 10, 2006

A Democratic operative shopped around the story of disgraced former congressman Mark Foley's inappropriate behavior with male pages more than one year ago, according to Harper's magazine.


In a story posted today on the weekly's website, reporter Ken Silverstein says that in May he received copies of the now-infamous e-mail exchanges between Foley and a 16-year-old page.


Silverstein said that one year ago his unnamed source provided the same material to the St. Petersburg Times and, he "presumes," the Miami Herald, which both decided against publishing the stories. The two papers already have acknowledged receiving copies of the e-mails ? the Times said it didn't run the story because the e-mails contained "nothing overtly sexual," and the boy and his family wouldn't speak on the record.




The Harper's reporter wrote a story after receiving the e-mails in May, but the magazine did not publish it, he said, "because we didn't have absolute proof that Foley was, as one editor put it, 'anything but creepy.'"


In the e-mails ? which were not sexually explicit but, nevertheless, troubled the teens' parents ? Foley requested a photograph and asked what the 16-year-old wanted for his birthday. Later, Foley's salacious instant-message exchanges with another teen prompted his resignation.

2006-10-10 11:29:02 · 10 answers · asked by Jean R 3

He seems to intentionally p*** the rest of us off every time he makes a speech on foreign policy

2006-10-10 11:27:43 · 11 answers · asked by BB 1

Why is it everytime the United States does something wrong the world hates us? But if some other country does something wrong everyone just gets over it or expresses 'concern'?

2006-10-10 11:16:58 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

help in Afghanistan (and are suprised when we say no)

Are the Yanks getting stupider by the day?

2006-10-10 11:06:23 · 17 answers · asked by BB 1

OR recreational sex with multiple partners
OR recreational abortions (just for kick & giggles)
OR hugging trees

2006-10-10 11:03:04 · 14 answers · asked by E LIB o NATOR 2

I am sick of people claiming that "Bush started the war" Do they really not remember the terrorist attacks? Or do they just want to hate on Bush as usual?

Another one is "We declared war on Afghanistan, not Iraq". I don't remember declaring war on Afghanistan! We declared war on terrorism, and I think we should continue to fight it in EVERY country, including Iraq.

Oh yeah, and "Our soldiers are dying for a lost cause". Well, would you rather our citizens die for a lost cause? It is sad the soldiers are dying, but they voluntarily enlisted, and that is what they are getting paid to do. And for all the soldiers who enlisted before the war, just to get a free college education? That's what you get for taking advantage of our country.

There should be no reason to protest the war. Compare 9/11 to Pearl Harbor. Did ANYONE in the country protest our attacking Japan? No! (they might not have liked the nuclear attack, but that is a different story)

2006-10-10 10:56:20 · 19 answers · asked by ihatehippies 3

besides inherit clintons massive surplus and 8 years of economic growth........

2006-10-10 10:55:40 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

if they arent good looking,,,why would americans watch?

2006-10-10 10:54:24 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous