Just 6 weeks before Sept. 11th?
2006-10-10 11:54:02 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Robodemocrat: Thank you. That makes more sense. I thought it kind of odd, I mean who would leave that kind of paper trail so obviously? Anyways, theres other questions about the event that need to be answered, maybes yous guys cans halps mes outs withs thems.
2006-10-10 12:24:58 · update #1
because he knew the trade centers were coming down check this out it is eye opening http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DoibU5njEM
bet you didn't know that George bush's younger brother ran the security for the world trade center and his contract ended that morning hum interesting , also bush Sr was having breakfast in Washington with the head of the bin laden family , i still wounder why fema showed up to new york on the night of Sept 10 Th 2001
hum i guess I'm just not smart enough to fill in the blanks
o did you know that sivlerstien bought and has a policy on the sears tower ! just watch but then they would have to be damn fools to pull the same crap , i mean common building 7 came down to its just weird that the only 3 buildings that ever collapsed from fire all fell on the same sight and same place i guess on that day the laws of physics just didn't apply,
i guess the facts are just to scary for alot to even think about i bet i get thumbs down even tho they dont spend the time to see what is just to real oh well sleep you lil sleepers not all of us are napping
truely this is the best documentary about the whole deal if you do watch this and still think that there was not a cover up you are truly a retard or are part of the cover up here is the link http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5946593973848835726&hl=en
2006-10-10 11:59:41 · answer #1 · answered by Duane G 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
He actually 'renewed' his policy 6 weeks before 9/11, it was not a new policy.
The 'Acts of Terrorism" clause was added immediately after the 1993 attack. This coverage was required by his insurer and not requested by Silverstein.
If you don't remember terrorist tried to topple the buildings once before.
PS: Do you like Kool-Aid?
2006-10-10 19:01:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Another question how did he order building number 7 pulled the same day as 9/11...when it takes weeks of planning to do...this is a fact and its on record..he said so himself in Radio interview.
2006-10-10 19:04:01 · answer #3 · answered by dstr 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Maybe because the World Trade Center was attacked by terrorists eight years earlier. Ooh, you conspiracy freaks forgot about that, didn't you!
2006-10-10 21:20:01 · answer #4 · answered by ddey65 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Insanity?
2006-10-10 18:58:17 · answer #5 · answered by notme 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
well there was an act of terror against it in the early 90s... that would make me think about it... although the timing is a little suspicious...
2006-10-10 19:01:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Can't a person renew their insurance policies without being accused of wrong doing?
2006-10-10 19:05:27 · answer #7 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Why, indeed.
2006-10-10 19:09:20 · answer #8 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋