English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I understand that he couldn´t have sent a nuclear facility anywhere so he probably didn´t have one of those but I´m wondering about all the chemical and bilogical weapons. After all he did use them against his own people, it´s a documented fact, and he wouldn´t let the inspectors in to see what he had leading up to the war so he must have been hiding something.

2006-10-10 12:08:50 · 8 answers · asked by Papachango 1 in Politics & Government Politics

8 answers

Just an FYI, yes there WERE WOMD. I saw the pictures in time magazine and all over of where he tested them on the Kurds. They were the ONLY reason he was able to repel the numerically superior forces of Iran during the Iran Iraq war. Bonus question for libs and cons... who REALLY gave him the WOMD... times up! If you guessed the USA... Hmmm... Gee, you think? So if you give someone 100 paintballs and you know they shoot say... 75 paintballs how many paintballs would you GUESS they still have... somewhere? Did he move them? Did he have them RECENTLY? Who knows, but claiming he NEVER had them is ABSURD, is against DOCUMENTED HISTORY, and ignores the horrid things Saddam did to whole villages of Kurds. It doesn't take alot of pictures of dead women clutching their dead infants after being killed with Mustard Gas to make you a little upset when people say "never had them"... Do you people even KNOW what that stuff does? Why do you think it was banned? Anyway... I think they were probably gone, used, burried, sold off, whatever way before the issue came up. He was just postering to prolong the inevitable... He needed to go, we needed to get rid of him, but now we need to get out and let Iraq decide its own destiny. If it goes evil again then we just have to go back, at least now they know we will...

2006-10-10 12:38:15 · answer #1 · answered by wtonysimpson 2 · 0 1

Anything is possible, but highly unlikely. The syrians and Saddam did not get along either, Saddam's regime did not get along with anybody. The country was under almost constant monitoring but weapons organizations for over a decade. The regime was not in a position after the first gulf war to implement any type of long term massive weapons projects.
Not likely.

2006-10-10 12:15:18 · answer #2 · answered by Dane 6 · 1 0

There may be a pair left; yet any WMD's left over from the GHW Bush and Oliver North days are they are so previous and degraded that Syria or Iraq does not prefer them. it may be safer to arm attempt against a rattle snake with Turret's Syndrome than to attempt to re-manufacture a 40 year previous WMD's bypass great crimson bypass

2016-11-27 20:10:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You can't send something that didn't exist anywhere. Those so-called mobile labs have been proven NOT have had anything to do with weapons of mass destruction.

2006-10-10 13:02:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There were NO mobile WMD labs.
There were NO WMD's at all.

The war was based on a total lie.

2006-10-10 12:11:21 · answer #5 · answered by Villain 6 · 2 1

SADDAM STARTED LETTING THE INSPECTORS IN AND IT WAS BUSH THAT KICKED THEM OUT. BUSH WANTED HIS LITTLE WAR AND HE GOT HIS LITTLE WAR.

2006-10-10 12:18:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

All U.A.E.A and CIA reports say no...but what do republicans care about facts?

2006-10-10 12:12:10 · answer #7 · answered by dstr 6 · 1 1

YES!!!!!!!!!

2006-10-10 12:12:28 · answer #8 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers