English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 15 September 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

And It's Bush, not the Americans the world hates!

2006-09-15 09:20:56 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-15 09:20:53 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Remember when George Carlin said "crime fighters fight crime, fire fighters fight fires, but who do freedom fighters fight?"

2006-09-15 09:20:06 · 4 answers · asked by Enterrador 4

http://rwor.org/a/1241/images/1241-vietnam.jpg

2006-09-15 09:14:14 · 23 answers · asked by 43 5

2006-09-15 09:08:02 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Clearly the name "pro-torture" is not wanted, kinda like those who are anti-abortion prefer to call themselves "pro life" (ironically, those same people are the ones who want torture and the death penalty legalized).

Anyways, they need a NEW NAME for their movement to be able to torture people until they give them information formed from total and absolute madness and pain!

What do you think it should be?

2006-09-15 09:05:16 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-15 09:04:19 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I don't think so. But I do think that they have an overly high opinion of their own education. They earn a few college credits, read Howard Zinn's history books, and presume to know everything there is to know. They form opinions based on their depthless education, and resolutely avoid learning anything new that might challenge their Mickey Mouse views.

In short, they only become educated enough to confirm what they want to believe, and then they use that bit of education to tower over others who don't share their views.

2006-09-15 09:04:07 · 16 answers · asked by BrianthePigEatingInfidel 4

...

2006-09-15 09:01:59 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

he took out a big ASPARAGUS ROD :-)

2006-09-15 08:58:06 · 7 answers · asked by ? 1

2006-09-15 08:52:22 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

its a life!

2006-09-15 08:46:12 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Government. i.e. the people fund the NHS so how can it be "IN DEBT"
It's being run like a Business rather than a Government funded establishment.

Hostpital, wards, beds, jobs are being lost because of "debts"

Yes more money than ever (may) be going in, but it's doing no good.

OR AM I JUST LISTENING TO THE MEDIA........!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2006-09-15 08:41:39 · 7 answers · asked by David T 3

How efective are MPs at representing their constituency? How much an influence do they have in the House of COmmons? etc

2006-09-15 08:38:01 · 8 answers · asked by Threep 1

The UN has done so much good for humanity. World leaders working together for peace. There are so many examples. The UN presently has internatinal "peacekeepers", not it's own army.

WOULD YOU SUPPORT THE U.N. WITH IT'S OWN STANDING ARMY?

I believe in a strong UN. A strong UN, with a strong leader. A United Nations Army with about 5 million men....would save American lives. Would deal with international threats, and rogue nations. THEN WE WILL HAVE PEACE.

2006-09-15 08:37:09 · 20 answers · asked by Villain 6

Why does the world (and USA) ignore the truly horrible tragedies going on in the world? I don't get it. Do you?

2006-09-15 08:28:30 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

tonight gloria stienman and former head of home land security will be bashing america .

2006-09-15 08:26:33 · 14 answers · asked by playtoofast 6

Was it 911, or November 9, 1989, when the Berlin Wall fell and left the U.S. at sea, drifting without an enemy in a strange new world, that changed everything?.

Through four decades of the Cold War, Americans had been able to feel reasonably united in their determination to fight evil. And everyone, even children, knew the name of the evildoers: "the commies." Within two years after the Wall fell, the Soviet Union had simply disappeared. In the U.S., nobody really knew how to fight evil now, or even who the evildoers were. The world's sole remaining superpower was "running out of demons," as Colin Powell complained.

See Full Article:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article14939.htm

.

2006-09-15 08:26:21 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-15 08:26:10 · 5 answers · asked by pillabrut 2

The dissident group led by McCain — and backed by Powell, Bush's first-term secretary of state — said Bush's approach would jeopardize the safety of U.S. troops.

Powell said Bush's proposal would redefine the Geneva Conventions and encourage the world to "doubt the moral basis of our fight against terrorism" and "put our own troops at risk."

2006-09-15 08:24:43 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Or are their scandals just Bigger.

2006-09-15 08:16:35 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Some seem to think there is a distinction. I can't really discern one at all.

2006-09-15 08:11:49 · 10 answers · asked by BrianthePigEatingInfidel 4

Ok, Miguel Cervantes wrote Don Quixote as a two part comedy in the period 1605-15.

Now in 2006 we have an administration fighting a war on terror...?
Is bush tilting at windmills?

PS... i am well aware of sept 11th and i am not a pinko comunist, i am just a little concearned that the currant administrartion seems to be led by a man who :

"...thought it expedient and necessary that he should commence knight-errant, and wander through the world, with his house and arms, in quest of adventure..."

Any how... give me your thoughts.

Thank you.

2006-09-15 08:08:00 · 9 answers · asked by Zarathustra 3

Another answerer said this: "Killing people removes people from the community, which disrupts community services, hinders community functionality and reduces community resources. And if you kill too many people, the community will cease to exist."

That is the only reason it is wrong to kill people, according to this person. There is nothing about the absolute worth of the individual there. This person believes that an individual only has value in proportion to their contribution to some community. This person does not believe in individual worth, and by implication, individual rights or the implicit value of the individual. It is all about the hive.

So for someone who thinks that way, I suppose it is only natural for them to favor abortion. Individual life is meaningless. It only has meaning within the context of some kind of barbed-wire, Berlin-walled community. If you are of no value to the community, then you have no value, like a broken egg for your omelette.

2006-09-15 08:06:20 · 3 answers · asked by BrianthePigEatingInfidel 4

Todays BBC headlines says:
"Speaking in Germany, the Pope quoted a 14th Century Christian emperor who said the Prophet Muhammad had brought the world only "evil and inhuman" things".

2006-09-15 08:05:18 · 16 answers · asked by zeus_christ 1

After all they count the votes of dead people and young children like that pest Ebee going to the polls. How can they possibly make sound decisions?

2006-09-15 08:02:03 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

If so, will the righties on T.V. and Radio attempt to smear anyone who attempts to bring the Cheney/Bush Regime to justice?

How will it play out?

2006-09-15 07:57:55 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-15 07:54:14 · 11 answers · asked by ahmad e 1

fedest.com, questions and answers