Politics - 15 September 2006

We find the truth, point out the lies, try to make others aware, vote out dangerous republicans and democrats like Leiberman, endure insults from lonely ignorant people who speak out for an administration who doesn't care for them personally but want their voices singing in their choir, and we pray everyday for 2008 to come quickly.

WE ARE THE AMERICANS !!!!


*

2006-09-15 05:14:07 · 10 answers · asked by pickle head 6

bush gave tenet a medal for ...........ignoring 911 warnings.

2006-09-15 05:12:00 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

SOURCE

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Apemu3sfG8nBZQ1Fm6HGgEfsy6IX?qid=20060914202558AAZLPyK

2006-09-15 05:11:23 · 2 answers · asked by 43 5

If you answer yes, what would be a good name and why?
If no, why not?

http://www.gp.org/
Their Ten Key Values
Grassroots Democracy
Social Justice
Ecological Wisdom
Non-violence
Decentralization
Community-based Economics
Feminism
Diversity
Responsibility
Future Focus

2006-09-15 05:09:44 · 4 answers · asked by senyor pechkin 1

Is it true? I got an email this morning telling me that Fox News gave Bush a 90% approval rating?

2006-09-15 05:05:11 · 23 answers · asked by Villain 6

let me get this straight, the catholic church, aka crusaders, south american invaders (who were in a "holy war" to spread christianity), perpetrators of the spanish inquisition, supporters of facist spain and italy and pope bendict who served in THE HITLER'S YOUTH criticising islam! IS THAT RICH OR WHAT?!?!

2006-09-15 05:04:15 · 8 answers · asked by rimrocka 3

U GUYS LEAVE MY TRANNY ALONE OR THERE WILL BE TROUBLE!

2006-09-15 05:02:50 · 4 answers · asked by Dr.Feelgood 2

2006-09-15 05:00:52 · 9 answers · asked by bcliff13 1

2006-09-15 04:59:06 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-15 04:58:50 · 5 answers · asked by notme 5

Could also apply to Arkansas and Tennessee, if they can come up with descent baseball players. Then they could fight the New York Yankees and commence all kinds of North/South violence. How glorious!

2006-09-15 04:56:16 · 4 answers · asked by Brackalicious 4

The Supreme Court said in U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995) that term limits cannot be applied by states to federally elected officials. The Republican Contract with America (which included term limits) was never passed by Congress.

2006-09-15 04:53:57 · 6 answers · asked by notme 5

2006-09-15 04:44:27 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

When one of these crazy leaders who have accesss to nuclear weapons decided to use it on us or one of our allies, will you admit maybe you were wrong about him?
He is debreifed daily on our enemies are you privy to such top secret information?
Sit and do nothing to prevent such an attack is so foolish.

2006-09-15 04:43:57 · 11 answers · asked by darlndanna 3

2006-09-15 04:39:20 · 17 answers · asked by adraya 2

2006-09-15 04:37:36 · 11 answers · asked by adraya 2

Hybrids have a lot of benefits. Less fuel, less pollution, less maintence.

Plus, it's less money that we have to send to the oil rich Arab states.

2006-09-15 04:36:51 · 17 answers · asked by Villain 6

Should the 35,000 Ford employees and 85,000 GM employees that got fired, get TORTURE jobs.

2006-09-15 04:36:24 · 10 answers · asked by 43 5

2006-09-15 04:34:25 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

In a marriage, usually one person works full time and someone stays home with the children or both work and struggle to find childcare (and to pay for it). In these cases, the children either are closer to one parent or long for both of their attention as they are at work all day long.

Wouldn't it work out fantastic if the parents could both work part time, that way the kids would see both of their parents during the week, there would be more family time together, and both parents could work, but not too much, and still see their children?

The only problem is that you have to be full time to get benefits like insurance and stuff...I think they offer healthcare to part time workers.

2006-09-15 04:27:39 · 4 answers · asked by Brackalicious 4

"The UN nuclear watchdog has protested to the US government over a report on Iran's nuclear programme, calling it "erroneous" and "misleading".

In a leaked letter, the IAEA said a congressional report contained serious distortions of the agency's own findings on Iran's nuclear activity.

The IAEA also took "strong exception" to claims made over the removal of a senior safeguards inspector.

There was no immediate comment from Washington over the letter."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5346524.stm

2006-09-15 04:23:38 · 9 answers · asked by blank 2

Remember I'm asking about CONFORMITY, thanks.

2006-09-15 04:21:51 · 5 answers · asked by Dr.Feelgood 5

During the administration of William Jefferson Clinton, the U.S. enjoyed more peace and economic well being than at any time in its history.He was the first Democratic president since Franklin D. Roosevelt to wina second term. He could point to the lowest unemployment rate in modern times, the lowest inflation in 30 years, the highest home ownership in the country's history, dropping crime rates in many places, and reduced welfare roles. He proposed the first balanced budget in decades and achieved a budget surplus. As part of a plan to celebrate the millennium in 2000, Clinton called for a great national initiative to end racial discrimination. A record like that! Now compare it to Dubya’s record of utter incompetence…LOL!! Dubya didn’t get up there by him self…Don’t you just want to give him a hand to get down from there?

2006-09-15 04:19:33 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

OF COURSE MICHELLE'S REAL NAME IS MICHAEL, A TRANNY--- I CAN BE YOUR BODYGAURD DR FEEL GOOD, IM MUCH BETTER THAN MIKEY!! TEE HEE HEE HEE HEE

2006-09-15 04:16:45 · 3 answers · asked by Simms 2

How in the world can the Republicans afford all these tax cuts for the rich? The deficits are 350 billion a year!

Shouldn't we have a balanced budget maybe? Or invest in education? Debt reduction? Social help for the poor?

I didn't want it.
I didn't need it.
But thanks anyway.

2006-09-15 04:09:00 · 6 answers · asked by Villain 6

That when people talk about issues involving parties they are often completely biased. Example?

ALL DEMOCRATS/LIBERALS/DEMONCRATS DO THIS!
or
ALL CONSERVATIVES/REPUBLICANS/NEOCONS DO THIS!

Seriously, what happened to the kinda people that knew that a party doesn't make the people, the people make the party. The people are then made up of individuals with their own individual views on everything. Not all liberals are for pro-choice on abortion. Not all conservatives are against gay rights.

Both the left and the right have people that generalize like that. Not all of them, of course, but some of them.

What're your views on this generalization on this site? Do you think it takes place in the real world too? Is this a recent development, has it grown in recent years, or has it always been like this?

2006-09-15 04:07:17 · 9 answers · asked by ? 5

to mislead the American public about his trade policies? I’m talking about BoxGate, that photo-opportunity at which Bush's aides slapped "Made in U.S.A." labels on boxes that were really stamped "Made in China", created a fake backdrop of more boxes, and relied on an audience of workers who were forced to attend the event by their bosses. How's that for honesty and honor in the White House?

2006-09-15 04:04:45 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Besides these lies:
1) We landed on the moon
2) Gulf of Tonkin really happened
3) Lone gunman in Dallas
4) 9/11 was done by 19 guys with box cutters

2006-09-15 04:03:53 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-15 04:03:17 · 24 answers · asked by Dastardly 6

2006-09-15 03:55:37 · 6 answers · asked by edubya 5